Xeon E3-1290
VS
Core i5-7400

Xeon E3-1290 vs Core i5-7400

Intel

Xeon E3-1290

4 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Core i5-7400

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E3-1290 is positioned at rank 525 and the Core i5-7400 is on rank 820, so the Xeon E3-1290 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1290

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
7655%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1445%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1284%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
992%
#323
EPYC 9224
MSRP: $1825|Avg: $1199
98%
#324
Xeon Gold 6423N
MSRP: $2161|Avg: $2161
98%
#325
Xeon w7-3565X
MSRP: $2689|Avg: $2850
97%
#326
Xeon W-1290TE
MSRP: $552|Avg: $552
97%
#328
Xeon w7-2495X
MSRP: $2189|Avg: $2900
96%
#329
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
MSRP: $4099|Avg: $4182
95%
#525
Xeon E3-1290
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#535
Xeon E3-1241 v3
MSRP: $273|Avg: $27
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7400

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16732%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15810%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11479%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3458%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2739%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2396%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1373%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1355%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1233%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1233%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1219%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1187%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1170%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1165%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1155%
#295
Core i9-7940X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $275
98%
#820
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
100%
#821
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#822
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
100%
#823
A6-9500
MSRP: $101|Avg: $25
100%
#824
Pentium G2120T
MSRP: $87|Avg: $10
100%
#825
Athlon II X2 270
MSRP: $72|Avg: $15
99%
#827
Core i7-6850K
MSRP: $617|Avg: $80
99%
#828
Core i5-2500K
MSRP: $225|Avg: $35
99%
#829
Pentium G3430
MSRP: $116|Avg: $30
98%
#830
Pentium E5400
MSRP: $55|Avg: $49
98%
#831
Core i5-4570R
MSRP: $250|Avg: $20
98%
#832
A6-3650
MSRP: $115|Avg: $20
98%
#833
Core i7-4770R
MSRP: $360|Avg: $89
98%
#835
Core i7-2600
MSRP: $294|Avg: $50
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7400 (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E3-1290Core i5-7400
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3-1290 (2011) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E3-1290Core i5-7400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($70)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3-1290 and Core i5-7400

Intel

Xeon E3-1290

The Xeon E3-1290 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,429 points. Launch price was $885.

Intel

Core i5-7400

The Core i5-7400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 5,477 points. Launch price was $182.

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1290 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-7400's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1290 versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i5-7400 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1290 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Xeon E3-1290 uses the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7400 uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1290 scores 5,429 against the Core i5-7400's 5,477 — a 0.9% lead for the Core i5-7400. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1290 vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i5-7400.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Core i5-7400
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
4 GHz+14%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+20%
3 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB (total)+33%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
5,429
5,477
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,359
Geekbench 6 Single
1,215
Geekbench 6 Multi
3,517
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1290 uses the LGA1155 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-7400 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Core i5-7400
Socket
LGA1155
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1290) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7400). The Core i5-7400 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E3-1290 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-7400 rivals Ryzen 3 3300X.

FeatureXeon E3-1290Core i5-7400
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming