Xeon E3110
VS
Core i5-10400F

Xeon E3110 vs Core i5-10400F

VS
Intel

Core i5-10400F

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E3110 is positioned at rank #965 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3110

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
34351%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
6486%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5762%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4452%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
100%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
100%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
99%
#535
Xeon W-3245M
MSRP: $5002|Avg: $5002
94%
#536
Xeon W-3265M
MSRP: $6300|Avg: $3500
93%
#965
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
100%
#968
Xeon L3406
MSRP: $189|Avg: $30
97%
#969
Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP: $2112|Avg: $62
96%
#971
Xeon L5430
MSRP: $390|Avg: $380
96%
#972
Xeon E5-2470
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $125
96%
#973
Xeon E5-2670
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $60
95%
#975
Xeon X3470
MSRP: $589|Avg: $16
94%
#978
Xeon E5-2689
MSRP: $1800|Avg: $18
91%
#979
Xeon E5-2450L
MSRP: $1106|Avg: $78
90%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400F

#92
Ryzen 5 8600G
MSRP: $229|Avg: $190
104%
#93
Core i7-13700KF
MSRP: $384|Avg: $350
102%
#94
Ryzen 7 9700X
MSRP: $359|Avg: $285
102%
#95
Ryzen 9 7900
MSRP: $429|Avg: $370
102%
#96
Core Ultra 5 235T
MSRP: $247|Avg: $247
102%
#97
Ryzen 9 5950X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $350
101%
#98
Ryzen 9 7900X3D
MSRP: $599|Avg: $389
101%
#99
Core i5-14400F
MSRP: $196|Avg: $199
101%
#100
Core i5-14400
MSRP: $221|Avg: $197
101%
#101
Core i5-13400
MSRP: $221|Avg: $185
101%
#102
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
MSRP: $699|Avg: $486
100%
#103
Core i5-11600
MSRP: $213|Avg: $140
100%
#104
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650G
MSRP: $259|Avg: $160
100%
#105
Core i9-12900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $322
100%
#106
Ryzen 7 5800XT
MSRP: $249|Avg: $219
100%
#107
Core i5-10400F
MSRP: $160|Avg: $102
100%
#108
Core i9-12900KF
MSRP: $564|Avg: $320
100%
#109
Ryzen 5 PRO 4650GE
MSRP: $209|Avg: $120
100%
#110
Ryzen 5 4600GE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $125
100%
#111
Core i5-10500T
MSRP: $226|Avg: $80
99%
#112
Core i5-14600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
99%
#113
Core i7-14700F
MSRP: $359|Avg: $330
98%
#114
Ryzen 3 PRO 3200G
MSRP: $89|Avg: $52
98%
#115
Core i9-14900K
MSRP: $589|Avg: $469
98%
#116
Ryzen 5 PRO 5655GE
MSRP: $146|Avg: $146
97%
#117
Core i7-13790F
MSRP: $392|Avg: $350
97%
#118
Core i5-14500
MSRP: $239|Avg: $251
97%
#119
Core i5-11600KF
MSRP: $237|Avg: $157
97%
#120
Ryzen 5 5600XT
MSRP: $192|Avg: $180
97%
#121
Core i5-13600
MSRP: $255|Avg: $255
97%
#122
Core i3-13100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $119
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10400F (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E3110Core i5-10400F
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($158)
More affordable ($102)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Legacy / 45 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E3110 (2008) relies on 45 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E3110Core i5-10400F
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+1458%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($158)
More affordable ($102)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E3110 and Core i5-10400F

Intel

Xeon E3110

The Xeon E3110 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. Base frequency: 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,295 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-10400F

The Core i5-10400F is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 13,029 points. Launch price was $155.

Processing Power

The Core i5-10400F is built on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E3110 scores 1,295 against the Core i5-10400F's 13,029 — a 163.8% lead for the Core i5-10400F. L3 cache: 6 MB L2 Cache on the Xeon E3110 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400F.

FeatureXeon E3110Core i5-10400F
Cores / Threads
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz+3%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB L2 Cache
12 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
14 nm-69%
Architecture
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
1,295
13,029+906%
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,191
Geekbench 6 Single
1,454
Geekbench 6 Multi
5,783
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3110 uses the LGA775 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i5-10400F uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E3110Core i5-10400F
Socket
LGA775
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3110) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i5-10400F). Primary use case: Core i5-10400F targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400F rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureXeon E3110Core i5-10400F
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E3110 launched at $214 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400F debuted at $160. At current prices ($158 vs $102), the Core i5-10400F is $56 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3110 delivers 8.2 pts/$ vs 127.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400F — making the Core i5-10400F the 175.9% better value option.

FeatureXeon E3110Core i5-10400F
MSRP
$214
$160-25%
Avg Price (30d)
$158
$102-35%
Performance per Dollar
8.2
127.7+1457%
Release Date
2008
2020