Xeon E5-1410
VS
Core i5-7442EQ

Xeon E5-1410 vs Core i5-7442EQ

Intel

Xeon E5-1410

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i5-7442EQ

4 Cores4 Thrd25 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1410 is positioned at rank 367 and the Core i5-7442EQ is on rank 807, so the Xeon E5-1410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1410

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5140%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
971%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
862%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
666%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
100%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
100%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
98%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
97%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
97%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-7442EQ

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
16118%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
15230%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
11058%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
3331%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2639%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2308%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1322%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1305%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1188%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1188%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1175%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1143%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1127%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1122%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1112%
#805
Pentium G620
MSRP: $64|Avg: $12
100%
#806
Pentium G645T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
100%
#807
Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $50
100%
#810
Core i3-3250T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
99%
#811
Core i5-5575R
MSRP: $265|Avg: $50
99%
#813
Core i3-3210
MSRP: $117|Avg: $25
99%
#814
Celeron G3900E
MSRP: $107|Avg: $35
98%
#815
Athlon II X3 435
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
98%
#816
Core i7-6822EQ
MSRP: $294|Avg: $190
98%
#817
Athlon II X4 645
MSRP: $126|Avg: $20
97%
#818
Core i5-7400
MSRP: $294|Avg: $70
96%
#819
Pentium E5800
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
96%
#820
Core i7-6820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $344
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-7442EQ (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-1410Core i5-7442EQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($50)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-1410 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-1410Core i5-7442EQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+10%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($50)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1410 and Core i5-7442EQ

Intel

Xeon E5-1410

The Xeon E5-1410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i5-7442EQ

The Core i5-7442EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 4,834 points. Launch price was $250.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1410 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Core i5-7442EQ's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i5-7442EQ — a 41.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-1410. The Xeon E5-1410 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i5-7442EQ uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1410 scores 4,852 against the Core i5-7442EQ's 4,834 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1410. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 vs 6 MB on the Core i5-7442EQ.

FeatureXeon E5-1410Core i5-7442EQ
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+52%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+67%
6 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB+300%
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,852
4,834
Geekbench 6 Single
728
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,387
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1410) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-7442EQ). The Core i5-7442EQ includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-1410 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-7442EQ targets Embedded.

FeatureXeon E5-1410Core i5-7442EQ
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Embedded
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1410 launched at $120 MSRP, while the Core i5-7442EQ debuted at $250. At current prices ($55 vs $50), the Core i5-7442EQ is $5 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1410 delivers 88.2 pts/$ vs 96.7 pts/$ for the Core i5-7442EQ — making the Core i5-7442EQ the 9.2% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1410Core i5-7442EQ
MSRP
$120-52%
$250
Avg Price (30d)
$55
$50-9%
Performance per Dollar
88.2
96.7+10%
Release Date
2012
2017