Xeon E5-1410
VS
Core i3-7350K

Xeon E5-1410 vs Core i3-7350K

Intel

Xeon E5-1410

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i3-7350K

2 Cores4 Thrd60 WWMax: 4.2 GHz2017

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1410 is positioned at rank 367 and the Core i3-7350K is on rank 636, so the Xeon E5-1410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1410

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5140%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
971%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
862%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
666%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
100%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
100%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
98%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
97%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
97%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-7350K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11418%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10789%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7834%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2360%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1869%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1635%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
937%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
924%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
842%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
842%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
832%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
810%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
798%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
795%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
788%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#636
Core i3-7350K
MSRP: $179|Avg: $45
100%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
99%
#639
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
99%
#640
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
99%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
99%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
99%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
98%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
98%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
98%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
97%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
97%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i3-7350K (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-1410Core i3-7350K
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($45)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-1410 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-1410Core i3-7350K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+23%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($55)
More affordable ($45)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1410 and Core i3-7350K

Intel

Xeon E5-1410

The Xeon E5-1410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $800.

Intel

Core i3-7350K

The Core i3-7350K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 4,886 points. Launch price was $179.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1410 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i3-7350K offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-1410 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i3-7350K — a 27% clock advantage for the Core i3-7350K (base: 2.8 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-1410 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-7350K uses Kaby Lake (2016−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1410 scores 4,852 against the Core i3-7350K's 4,886 — a 0.7% lead for the Core i3-7350K. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 vs 4 MB (total) on the Core i3-7350K.

FeatureXeon E5-1410Core i3-7350K
Cores / Threads
4 / 8+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.2 GHz+31%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
4.2 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+150%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark
4,852
4,886
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,100
Geekbench 6 Single
1,298
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,740
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1410 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i3-7350K uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1410Core i3-7350K
Socket
LGA1356
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-1410) / true (Core i3-7350K). The Core i3-7350K includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-1410 requires a dedicated GPU.

FeatureXeon E5-1410Core i3-7350K
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Intel HD Graphics 630
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1410 launched at $120 MSRP, while the Core i3-7350K debuted at $179. At current prices ($55 vs $45), the Core i3-7350K is $10 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1410 delivers 88.2 pts/$ vs 108.6 pts/$ for the Core i3-7350K — making the Core i3-7350K the 20.7% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1410Core i3-7350K
MSRP
$120-33%
$179
Avg Price (30d)
$55
$45-18%
Performance per Dollar
88.2
108.6+23%
Release Date
2012
2017