Xeon E5-1410
VS
FX-8140

Xeon E5-1410 vs FX-8140

Intel

Xeon E5-1410

4 Cores8 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2012
VS
AMD

FX-8140

8 Cores8 Thrd95 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1410 is positioned at rank 367 and the FX-8140 is on rank 759, so the Xeon E5-1410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1410

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5140%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
971%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
862%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
666%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
100%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
100%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#261
Xeon w3-2435
MSRP: $669|Avg: $790
98%
#263
Xeon 6710E
MSRP: $1565|Avg: $344
97%
#264
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $180
97%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8140

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
14431%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
13636%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
9901%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2983%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
2363%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2067%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1184%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1168%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1064%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1064%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1052%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1023%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1009%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1005%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
996%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
97%
#759
FX-8140
MSRP: $225|Avg: $120
100%
#760
Athlon X2 450
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
100%
#761
Athlon II X3 450
MSRP: $87|Avg: $15
99%
#762
Core i7-4790
MSRP: $339|Avg: $60
99%
#763
Pentium G640
MSRP: $64|Avg: $5
99%
#764
Pentium G840
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
99%
#765
Core i5-6440EQ
MSRP: $250|Avg: $150
99%
#767
Core i5-4590T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $130
98%
#769
Celeron G530T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $17
98%
#770
Core i7-4770K
MSRP: $339|Avg: $100
97%
#771
A10-9700
MSRP: $169|Avg: $40
97%
#772
Core i5-2400
MSRP: $184|Avg: $25
97%
#773
Core i7-5775C
MSRP: $366|Avg: $150
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($55) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-1410 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-1410FX-8140
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($55)
⚠️ Higher cost ($120)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8140 ($120), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($65 less, 118% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-1410FX-8140
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+118%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($55)
⚠️ Higher cost ($120)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1410 and FX-8140

Intel

Xeon E5-1410

The Xeon E5-1410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $800.

AMD

FX-8140

The FX-8140 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 October 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,860 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1410 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8140 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8140 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 versus 4.1 GHz on the FX-8140 — a 24.7% clock advantage for the FX-8140 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Xeon E5-1410 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the FX-8140 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1410 scores 4,852 against the FX-8140's 4,860 — a 0.2% lead for the FX-8140. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 vs 8 MB (total) on the FX-8140.

FeatureXeon E5-1410FX-8140
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz
4.1 GHz+28%
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
3.2 GHz+14%
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)+25%
8 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
8 MB+3100%
Process
32 nm
32 nm
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EN (2012)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
4,852
4,860
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1410 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the FX-8140 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-1410FX-8140
Socket
LGA1356
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1410 launched at $120 MSRP, while the FX-8140 debuted at $225. At current prices ($55 vs $120), the Xeon E5-1410 is $65 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1410 delivers 88.2 pts/$ vs 40.5 pts/$ for the FX-8140 — making the Xeon E5-1410 the 74.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1410FX-8140
MSRP
$120-47%
$225
Avg Price (30d)
$55-54%
$120
Performance per Dollar
88.2+118%
40.5
Release Date
2012
2012