Xeon E5-1410 vs Processor N95
Xeon E5-1410
Processor N95
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-1410 is positioned at rank 367 and the Processor N95 is on rank 695, so the Xeon E5-1410 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1410
Performance Per Dollar Processor N95
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-1410 | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($55) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Alder Lake-N (2023) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-1410 | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+48%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($55) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1410 and Processor N95
Xeon E5-1410
The Xeon E5-1410 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 4,852 points. Launch price was $800.
Processor N95
The Processor N95 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-N (2023) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 0.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): + 6 MB. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 4,783 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-1410 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, matching the Processor N95's 4 cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-1410 versus 3.4 GHz on the Processor N95 — a 6.1% clock advantage for the Processor N95 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 0.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-1410 uses the Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Processor N95 uses Alder Lake-N (2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1410 scores 4,852 against the Processor N95's 4,783 — a 1.4% lead for the Xeon E5-1410. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1410 vs 6 MB (total) on the Processor N95.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1410 | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.4 GHz+6% |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz+2700% | 0.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 10240 kB (total)+67% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 2 MB (total)+700% |
| Process | 32 nm | 10 nm-69% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EN (2012) | Alder Lake-N (2023) |
| PassMark | 4,852+1% | 4,783 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-1410 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Processor N95 uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1410 | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1356 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-1410 launched at $120 MSRP, while the Processor N95 debuted at $160. At current prices ($55 vs $80), the Xeon E5-1410 is $25 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1410 delivers 88.2 pts/$ vs 59.8 pts/$ for the Processor N95 — making the Xeon E5-1410 the 38.4% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-1410 | Processor N95 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $120-25% | $160 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $55-31% | $80 |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.2+47% | 59.8 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-1410 and Processor N95
