Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-1620 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,338 vs 7,421).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.3 vs 19.9 PassMark/$ ($1,166 MSRP vs $372 MSRP).

Xeon E5-1630 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $794 less on MSRP ($372 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).
✅Delivers 217.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.9 vs 6.3 PassMark/$ ($372 MSRP vs $1,166 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-1630 v3 better than Xeon E5-1620 v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-1630 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 1.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-1630 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-1630 v3 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-1630 v3 comes in $794 cheaper on MSRP at $372 MSRP versus $1,166 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 217.0% better value on MSRP (19.9 vs 6.3 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-1620 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-1620 v4 vs Xeon E5-1630 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-1620 v4

The Xeon E5-1620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,338 points. Launch price was $294.

Xeon E5-1630 v3

The Xeon E5-1630 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 140 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 7,421 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-1620 v4 and Xeon E5-1630 v3 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 v4 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1630 v3 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.5 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 v4 uses the Broadwell-EP (2016) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-1630 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 v4 scores 7,338 against the Xeon E5-1630 v3's 7,421 — a 1.1% lead for the Xeon E5-1630 v3. Both processors carry 10 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v4	Xeon E5-1630 v3
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.8 GHz	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.5 GHz	3.7 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	10 MB (total)	10 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	256K (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell-EP (2016)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	7,338	7,421+1%

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v4	Xeon E5-1630 v3
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 4.0+33%

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-1620 v4 was priced at $1166, while the Xeon E5-1630 v3 came in at $372. On launch pricing ($1166 vs $372), Xeon E5-1630 v3 was $794 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 v4 delivers 6.3 pts/$ vs 19.9 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-1630 v3 — making the Xeon E5-1630 v3 the 104.1% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-1620 v4	Xeon E5-1630 v3
MSRP	$1166	$372-68%
Performance per Dollar	6.3	19.9+216%
Release Date	2016	2014

Search Xeon E5-1620 v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-1630 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.