Xeon E5-1620
VS
Ryzen 7 3700X

Xeon E5-1620 vs Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel

Xeon E5-1620

4 Cores8 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2012
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-1620 is positioned at rank #953 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-1620

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
31441%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
5936%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
5274%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
4074%
#529
Xeon Max 9480
MSRP: $12980|Avg: $12980
97%
#530
Xeon E5-2689 v4
MSRP: $2723|Avg: $100
95%
#531
EPYC 7543
MSRP: $10257|Avg: $468
93%
#532
Xeon Platinum 8368Q
MSRP: $7719|Avg: $7719
92%
#533
Xeon Gold 6250
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $2000
91%
#534
Xeon E5-2699 v4
MSRP: $4115|Avg: $400
91%
#953
Xeon E5-1620
MSRP: $885|Avg: $70
100%
#955
Xeon E5462
MSRP: $342|Avg: $45
98%
#958
Xeon E5-4650 v2
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $48
96%
#959
Xeon E5-1620 v4
MSRP: $1166|Avg: $160
95%
#963
Xeon E5-2660
MSRP: $1329|Avg: $65
92%
#964
Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
92%
#966
Xeon E3110
MSRP: $214|Avg: $158
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 7 3700X

#28
Core Ultra 7 265KF
MSRP: $379|Avg: $323
113%
#29
Core Ultra 7 265F
MSRP: $369|Avg: $276
111%
#30
Core i5-12400F
MSRP: $174|Avg: $110
111%
#31
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
109%
#32
Ryzen 7 2700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $100
109%
#33
Core i3-10100F
MSRP: $88|Avg: $50
109%
#34
Ryzen 5 7400F
MSRP: $150|Avg: $147
108%
#35
Ryzen 5 9600X
MSRP: $279|Avg: $178
105%
#36
Ryzen 7 3800X
MSRP: $399|Avg: $140
103%
#37
Ryzen 3 5300G
MSRP: $130|Avg: $80
102%
#38
Ryzen 9 7900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $316
101%
#39
Ryzen 5 5600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $135
101%
#40
Core i5-14600KF
MSRP: $304|Avg: $239
101%
#41
Ryzen 7 5800
MSRP: $349|Avg: $160
100%
#42
Core i3-14100F
MSRP: $109|Avg: $96
100%
#43
Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP: $329|Avg: $140
100%
#44
Ryzen 5 7600X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $178
99%
#45
Ryzen 3 3100
MSRP: $99|Avg: $75
99%
#46
Core i5-13490F
MSRP: $235|Avg: $170
98%
#47
Ryzen 5 5600F
MSRP: $99|Avg: $129
98%
#48
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
98%
#49
Ryzen 3 4300GE
MSRP: $94|Avg: $72
97%
#50
Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE
MSRP: $169|Avg: $50
97%
#51
Core Ultra 5 225
MSRP: $240|Avg: $200
97%
#52
Core i5-11500
MSRP: $192|Avg: $110
97%
#53
Core i3-12100F
MSRP: $97|Avg: $90
97%
#54
Core Ultra 7 265
MSRP: $384|Avg: $320
97%
#55
Ryzen 7 5800X
MSRP: $449|Avg: $180
96%
#56
Core i5-11400F
MSRP: $157|Avg: $110
96%
#57
Ryzen 7 5700G
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
95%
#58
Ryzen 7 5700X
MSRP: $299|Avg: $175
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Ryzen 7 3700X (2019) utilizes 7 nm, 12 nm technology and **DDR4 Dual-channel**, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-1620Ryzen 7 3700X
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($70)
⚠️ Higher cost ($140)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) / 32 nm)
✨ Modern (Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-1620 (2012) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-1620Ryzen 7 3700X
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+92%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($70)
⚠️ Higher cost ($140)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-1620 and Ryzen 7 3700X

Intel

Xeon E5-1620

The Xeon E5-1620 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 5,848 points. Launch price was $313.

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-1620 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-1620 versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-1620 uses the Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013) architecture (32 nm), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-1620 scores 5,848 against the Ryzen 7 3700X's 22,430 — a 117.3% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 10240 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-1620 vs 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X.

FeatureXeon E5-1620Ryzen 7 3700X
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.4 GHz+16%
Base Clock
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
L3 Cache
10240 kB (total)
32 MB+220%
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512K (per core)+100%
Process
32 nm
7 nm, 12 nm-78%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-E (2011−2013)
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
PassMark
5,848
22,430+284%
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,469
Geekbench 6 Single
612
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,250
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-1620 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Ryzen 7 3700X uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E5-1620 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X — the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-1620 supports up to 375 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 98.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-1620) vs 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-1620) vs 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) — the Xeon E5-1620 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel C600,Intel X79 (Xeon E5-1620) and AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X).

FeatureXeon E5-1620Ryzen 7 3700X
Socket
LGA2011
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 4.0+100%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1600
DDR4-3200+33%
Max RAM Capacity
375 GB+193%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+67%
24
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: true (Xeon E5-1620) / not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X).

FeatureXeon E5-1620Ryzen 7 3700X
Integrated GPU
No
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-1620 launched at $885 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 3700X debuted at $329. At current prices ($70 vs $140), the Xeon E5-1620 is $70 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-1620 delivers 83.5 pts/$ vs 160.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 3700X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 62.9% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-1620Ryzen 7 3700X
MSRP
$885
$329-63%
Avg Price (30d)
$70-50%
$140
Performance per Dollar
83.5
160.2+92%
Release Date
2012
2019