Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2430L v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Draws 60W instead of 80W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,190 vs 6,251).

Xeon E5-2620 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+1% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌33.3% higher power demand at 80W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2430L v2 better than Xeon E5-2620 v2?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2430L v2 is ahead with a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v2 pulls ahead with 1% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2430L v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2430L v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2430L v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon E5-2620 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2430L v2

The Xeon E5-2430L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,190 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon E5-2620 v2

The Xeon E5-2620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,251 points. Launch price was $417.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2430L v2 and Xeon E5-2620 v2 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430L v2 versus 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v2 — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2430L v2 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2620 v2 is built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2430L v2 scores 6,190 against the Xeon E5-2620 v2's 6,251 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v2. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v2.

Feature	Xeon E5-2430L v2	Xeon E5-2620 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz+8%	2.6 GHz
Base Clock	2.4 GHz+14%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	15 MB Intel® Smart Cache	15 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	—	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	6,190	6,251

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2430L v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.