Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon X5670

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon X5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon X5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2430L v2

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Draws 60W instead of 95W, a 35W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon X5670

2010

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2430L v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,160 vs 6,190).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 15 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $67 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2430L v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 95W vs 60W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2430L v2 better than Xeon X5670?

Yes. Xeon E5-2430L v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2430L v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 5.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2430L v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.5% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2430L v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5670 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2430L v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $67 MSRP, and it still gives you a 5.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon X5670 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2430L v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010), 25% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 12 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs Xeon X5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2430L v2

The Xeon E5-2430L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,190 points. Launch price was $800.

Xeon X5670

The Xeon X5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,160 points. Launch price was $67.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2430L v2 and Xeon X5670 share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430L v2 versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5670 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Xeon X5670 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The Xeon X5670 is built on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2430L v2 scores 6,190 against the Xeon X5670's 6,160 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5-2430L v2. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Xeon E5-2430L v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon X5670.

Feature	Xeon E5-2430L v2	Xeon X5670
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	2.8 GHz	3.33 GHz+19%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	2.93 GHz+22%
L3 Cache	15 MB Intel® Smart Cache+25%	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	—	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	—	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,190	6,160

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2430L v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon X5670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2430L v2	Xeon X5670
Socket	LGA1356	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3-1333
RAM Channels	—	3
ECC Support	—	Yes

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2430L v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5670). Primary use case: Xeon X5670 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Xeon X5670 rivals Core i7-980X.