FX-8370 vs Xeon E5-2430L v2

FX-8370 vs Xeon E5-2430L v2 Performance Spectrum

FX-8370

8 / 8

6,184

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2430L v2

6 / 12

6,190

+0.1%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8370 vs Xeon E5-2430L v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8370 vs Xeon E5-2430L v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8370

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Xeon E5-2430L v2.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,184 vs 6,190).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2430L v2, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2430L v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌108.3% higher power demand at 125W vs 60W.

Xeon E5-2430L v2

2014

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Draws 60W instead of 125W, a 65W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8370.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2430L v2 better than FX-8370?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2430L v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2430L v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2430L v2 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Xeon E5-2430L v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. FX-8370 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (31.1 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2430L v2 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

FX-8370 vs Xeon E5-2430L v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8370

The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E5-2430L v2

The Xeon E5-2430L v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-800, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 6,190 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2430L v2 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-8370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 versus 2.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2430L v2 — a 42.3% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 4 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The FX-8370 is built on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. In PassMark, the FX-8370 scores 6,184 against the Xeon E5-2430L v2's 6,190 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2430L v2.

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon E5-2430L v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+54%	2.8 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	—	15 MB Intel® Smart Cache
L2 Cache	8192 kB	—
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	—
PassMark	6,184	6,190
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	520	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,050	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5-2430L v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon E5-2430L v2
Socket	AM3+	LGA1356
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: AMD-V (FX-8370) / not specified (Xeon E5-2430L v2). Primary use case: FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.