FX-8370
VS
Xeon E3-1265L v3

FX-8370 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

AMD

FX-8370

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2014
VS
Intel

Xeon E3-1265L v3

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8370 is positioned at rank 583 and the Xeon E3-1265L v3 is on rank 610, so the FX-8370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar FX-8370

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10029%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9477%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6881%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2073%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1642%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1436%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
823%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
812%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
739%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
739%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
731%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
711%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
701%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
698%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
692%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
99%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
98%
#583
FX-8370
MSRP: $199|Avg: $100
100%
#584
Pentium G4520
MSRP: $86|Avg: $45
100%
#585
Core i3-4170
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
100%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
100%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
99%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
98%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
98%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
97%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
96%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1265L v3

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
9878%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
1865%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
1657%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1280%
#365
EPYC 7513
MSRP: $2840|Avg: $389
100%
#366
Xeon Silver 4216
MSRP: $1011|Avg: $800
99%
#367
EPYC 9454P
MSRP: $4598|Avg: $3333
98%
#369
Xeon Gold 6542Y
MSRP: $2878|Avg: N/A
95%
#370
EPYC 7502
MSRP: $2600|Avg: $1299
95%
#371
Xeon 6730P
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
95%
#372
Xeon Gold 6330
MSRP: $2128|Avg: $2128
94%
#373
Xeon Gold 6548Y+
MSRP: $3726|Avg: $3726
94%
#610
Xeon E3-1265L v3
MSRP: $294|Avg: $398
100%
#611
Xeon E3-1280 v2
MSRP: $315|Avg: $50
100%
#617
Xeon W-2133
MSRP: $617|Avg: $617
97%
#621
Xeon E5607
MSRP: $135|Avg: $27
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($398) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightFX-8370Xeon E3-1265L v3
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($398)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-8370 ($100), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($298 less, 75% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightFX-8370Xeon E3-1265L v3
Cost Efficiency
Better overall value (+298%)
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($100)
⚠️ Higher cost ($398)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of FX-8370 and Xeon E3-1265L v3

AMD

FX-8370

The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.

Intel

Xeon E3-1265L v3

The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.

Processing Power

The FX-8370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — a 15% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The FX-8370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8370 scores 6,184 against the Xeon E3-1265L v3's 6,187 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 520 vs 996, a 62.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,050 vs 3,458 (51.1% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3).

FeatureFX-8370Xeon E3-1265L v3
Cores / Threads
8 / 8+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
4.3 GHz+16%
3.7 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+60%
2.5 GHz
L3 Cache
8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache
8192 kB+3100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
32 nm
22 nm-31%
Architecture
Vishera (2012−2015)
Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark
6,184
6,187
Cinebench R23 Multi
3,800
Geekbench 6 Single
520
996+92%
Geekbench 6 Multi
2,050
3,458+69%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (FX-8370) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1265L v3) — the FX-8370 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 970,990FX,990X (FX-8370) and C220 Series,Intel 80 Series (Xeon E3-1265L v3).

FeatureFX-8370Xeon E3-1265L v3
Socket
AM3+
LGA1150
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
20+25%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8370 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8370) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the FX-8370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.

FeatureFX-8370Xeon E3-1265L v3
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
None
HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
Yes
Target Use
Legacy Gaming
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The FX-8370 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 debuted at $294. At current prices ($100 vs $398), the FX-8370 is $298 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8370 delivers 61.8 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — making the FX-8370 the 119.6% better value option.

FeatureFX-8370Xeon E3-1265L v3
MSRP
$199-32%
$294
Avg Price (30d)
$100-75%
$398
Performance per Dollar
61.8+299%
15.5
Release Date
2014
2013