FX-8370 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

CPU

GPU

FX-8370

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon E3-1265L v3

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.7 GHz2013

Buy on Amazon

FX-8370 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3 Performance Spectrum

FX-8370

8 / 8

6,184

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E3-1265L v3

4 / 8

6,187

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8370 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8370 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8370

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $95 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅Delivers 47.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 21.0 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $294 MSRP).
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Xeon E3-1265L v3.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,050 vs 3,458).
❌177.8% higher power demand at 125W vs 45W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1265L v3 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Xeon E3-1265L v3

2013

Why buy it

✅+68.7% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 45W instead of 125W, a 80W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics P4600, while FX-8370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 21.0 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($294 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8370.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8370 better than Xeon E3-1265L v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1265L v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E3-1265L v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 68.7% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8370 is the better buy right now. FX-8370 comes in $95 cheaper on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $294 MSRP, and it still gives you a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1265L v3 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 68.7% better Geekbench multi-core. It is also 47.7% better value on MSRP (31.1 vs 21.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

FX-8370 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8370

The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E3-1265L v3

The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — a 15% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The FX-8370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8370 scores 6,184 against the Xeon E3-1265L v3's 6,187 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 520 vs 996, a 62.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,050 vs 3,458 (51.1% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3).

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+16%	3.7 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+60%	2.5 GHz
L3 Cache	—	8192 kB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	22 nm-31%
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Haswell-WS (2013−2014)
PassMark	6,184	6,187
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	520	996+92%
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,050	3,458+69%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8370 versus DDR3-1600 on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — the FX-8370 supports 16.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (FX-8370) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1265L v3) — the FX-8370 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 970,990FX,990X (FX-8370) and C220 Series,Intel 80 Series (Xeon E3-1265L v3).

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Socket	AM3+	LGA1150
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 5.0+150%
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+17%	DDR3-1600
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20+25%	16

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8370 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8370) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the FX-8370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon E3-1265L v3
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	None	HD Graphics P4600
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	Yes
Target Use	Legacy Gaming	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8370 was priced at $199, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 came in at $294. On launch pricing ($199 vs $294), FX-8370 was $95 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8370 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 21.0 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — making the FX-8370 the 38.5% better value option.

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon E3-1265L v3
MSRP	$199-32%	$294
Performance per Dollar	31.1+48%	21.0
Release Date	2014	2013

Search FX-8370 on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1265L v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.