
FX-8370 vs Xeon E3-1265L v3

FX-8370

Xeon E3-1265L v3
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The FX-8370 is positioned at rank 583 and the Xeon E3-1265L v3 is on rank 610, so the FX-8370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar FX-8370
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E3-1265L v3
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | FX-8370 | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Vishera (2012−2015) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-WS (2013−2014) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | FX-8370 | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+298%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($100) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($398) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of FX-8370 and Xeon E3-1265L v3

FX-8370
The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon E3-1265L v3
The Xeon E3-1265L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Haswell-WS (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 8192 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,187 points. Launch price was $710.
Processing Power
The FX-8370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — a 15% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 4 GHz vs 2.5 GHz). The FX-8370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses Haswell-WS (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8370 scores 6,184 against the Xeon E3-1265L v3's 6,187 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 520 vs 996, a 62.8% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 2,050 vs 3,458 (51.1% advantage for the Xeon E3-1265L v3).
| Feature | FX-8370 | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 8+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+16% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+60% | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8192 kB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 8192 kB+3100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Vishera (2012−2015) | Haswell-WS (2013−2014) |
| PassMark | 6,184 | 6,187 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 3,800 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 520 | 996+92% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 2,050 | 3,458+69% |
Memory & Platform
The FX-8370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-1866 memory speed. Both support up to 32 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 20 (FX-8370) vs 16 (Xeon E3-1265L v3) — the FX-8370 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 970,990FX,990X (FX-8370) and C220 Series,Intel 80 Series (Xeon E3-1265L v3).
| Feature | FX-8370 | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3+ | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 5.0+150% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1866 | DDR3-1600 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 32 GB | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 20+25% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Only the FX-8370 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8370) vs Yes (Xeon E3-1265L v3). The Xeon E3-1265L v3 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics P4600), while the FX-8370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming, Xeon E3-1265L v3 targets Server. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.
| Feature | FX-8370 | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | None | HD Graphics P4600 |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | Yes |
| Target Use | Legacy Gaming | Server |
Value Analysis
The FX-8370 launched at $199 MSRP, while the Xeon E3-1265L v3 debuted at $294. At current prices ($100 vs $398), the FX-8370 is $298 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8370 delivers 61.8 pts/$ vs 15.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1265L v3 — making the FX-8370 the 119.6% better value option.
| Feature | FX-8370 | Xeon E3-1265L v3 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $199-32% | $294 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $100-75% | $398 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.8+299% | 15.5 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












