FX-8370 vs Xeon X5670

CPU

GPU

FX-8370

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2014

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

Xeon X5670

6 Cores12 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.33 GHz2010

Similar parts

·······

Buy on Amazon

FX-8370 vs Xeon X5670 Performance Spectrum

FX-8370

8 / 8

6,184

+0.4%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon X5670

6 / 12

6,160

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

FX-8370 vs Xeon X5670 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

FX-8370 vs Xeon X5670: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

FX-8370

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Xeon X5670.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon X5670, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 31.1 vs 91.9 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $67 MSRP).
❌31.6% higher power demand at 125W vs 95W.

Xeon X5670

2010

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads.
✅Costs $132 less on MSRP ($67 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Delivers 195.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 91.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($67 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
✅Draws 95W instead of 125W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (6,160 vs 6,184).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8370.

Quick Answers

So, is FX-8370 better than Xeon X5670?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon X5670 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while FX-8370 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, FX-8370 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, FX-8370 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

FX-8370 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon X5670 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. FX-8370 comes in 197.0% more expensive on MSRP at $199 MSRP versus $67 MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon X5670 is also 195.9% better value on MSRP (91.9 vs 31.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

FX-8370 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2014 vs 2010) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 8 threads instead of 6/12. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

FX-8370 vs Xeon X5670 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

FX-8370

The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.

Xeon X5670

The Xeon X5670 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 16 March 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.93 GHz, with boost up to 3.33 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,160 points. Launch price was $67.

⚡

Processing Power

The FX-8370 packs 8 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon X5670 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the FX-8370 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 versus 3.33 GHz on the Xeon X5670 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 4 GHz vs 2.93 GHz). The FX-8370 uses the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture (32 nm), while the Xeon X5670 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the FX-8370 scores 6,184 against the Xeon X5670's 6,160 — a 0.4% lead for the FX-8370.

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon X5670
Cores / Threads	8 / 8+33%	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+29%	3.33 GHz
Base Clock	4 GHz+37%	2.93 GHz
L3 Cache	—	12 MB (total)
L2 Cache	8192 kB+3100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	32 nm	32 nm
Architecture	Vishera (2012−2015)	Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
PassMark	6,184	6,160
Cinebench R23 Multi	3,800	—
Geekbench 6 Single	520	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	2,050	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The FX-8370 uses the AM3+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon X5670 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the FX-8370 versus DDR3-1333 on the Xeon X5670 — the FX-8370 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Memory channels: 2 (FX-8370) vs 3 (Xeon X5670). Chipset compatibility: 970,990FX,990X (FX-8370) and Intel X58,Intel 5520 (Xeon X5670).

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon X5670
Socket	AM3+	LGA1366
PCIe Generation	PCIe 2.0	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866+40%	DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity	32 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	3+50%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8370 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: AMD-V (FX-8370) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon X5670). Primary use case: FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming, Xeon X5670 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400; Xeon X5670 rivals Core i7-980X.

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon X5670
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	None	—
Unlocked	Yes	No
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	AMD-V	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	Legacy Gaming	Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the FX-8370 was priced at $199, while the Xeon X5670 came in at $67. On launch pricing ($199 vs $67), Xeon X5670 was $132 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the FX-8370 delivers 31.1 pts/$ vs 91.9 pts/$ for the Xeon X5670 — making the Xeon X5670 the 99% better value option.

Feature	FX-8370	Xeon X5670
MSRP	$199	$67-66%
Performance per Dollar	31.1	91.9+195%
Release Date	2014	2010

Search FX-8370 on Amazon

Search Xeon X5670 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.