Core i7-6700TE vs FX-8370

CPU

GPU

Core i7-6700TE

4 Cores8 Thrd35 WWMax: 3.4 GHz2015

Buy on Amazon

FX-8370

8 Cores8 Thrd125 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2014

Buy on Amazon

Core i7-6700TE vs FX-8370 Performance Spectrum

Core i7-6700TE

4 / 8

6,203

+0.3%

6,184

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-6700TE vs FX-8370 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-6700TE vs FX-8370: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-6700TE

2015

Why buy it

✅+58.2% higher Geekbench multi-core.
✅Draws 35W instead of 125W, a 90W reduction.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with HD Graphics 530, while FX-8370 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than FX-8370 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 20.5 vs 31.1 PassMark/$ ($303 MSRP vs $199 MSRP).
❌No boxed cooler included, unlike FX-8370.

FX-8370

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $104 less on MSRP ($199 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅Delivers 51.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 31.1 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($199 MSRP vs $303 MSRP).
✅25% more PCIe lanes (20 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Includes a boxed cooler (Stock Cooler), unlike Core i7-6700TE.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (2,050 vs 3,244).
❌257.1% higher power demand at 125W vs 35W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i7-6700TE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-6700TE better than FX-8370?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, FX-8370 is ahead with a 14.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700TE pulls ahead with 58.2% better Geekbench multi-core.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-6700TE is the stronger fit. You are getting 58.2% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-6700TE is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i7-6700TE comes in 52.3% more expensive on MSRP at $303 MSRP versus $199 MSRP, and it still gives you 58.2% better Geekbench multi-core. FX-8370 only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2014 platform. Even with 51.8% better value on paper (31.1 vs 20.5 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on AM3+.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-6700TE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2015 vs 2014) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-6700TE vs FX-8370 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-6700TE

The Core i7-6700TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 6,203 points. Launch price was $303.

FX-8370

The FX-8370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 September 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Vishera (2012−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L2 cache: 8192 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,184 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-6700TE packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the FX-8370 offers 8 cores / 8 threads — the FX-8370 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the Core i7-6700TE versus 4.3 GHz on the FX-8370 — a 23.4% clock advantage for the FX-8370 (base: 2.4 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Core i7-6700TE uses the Skylake (2015−2016) architecture (14 nm), while the FX-8370 uses Vishera (2012−2015) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-6700TE scores 6,203 against the FX-8370's 6,184 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-6700TE. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 914 vs 520, a 55% lead for the Core i7-6700TE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 3,244 vs 2,050 (45.1% advantage for the Core i7-6700TE).

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	FX-8370
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 8+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz	4.3 GHz+26%
Base Clock	2.4 GHz	4 GHz+67%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	—
L2 Cache	256K (per core)	8192 kB+3100%
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Skylake (2015−2016)	Vishera (2012−2015)
PassMark	6,203	6,184
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	3,800
Geekbench 6 Single	914+76%	520
Geekbench 6 Multi	3,244+58%	2,050

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-6700TE uses the LGA1151 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-8370 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Core i7-6700TE versus DDR3-1866 on the FX-8370 — the Core i7-6700TE supports 14.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i7-6700TE supports up to 64 GB of RAM compared to 32 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Core i7-6700TE) vs 20 (FX-8370) — the FX-8370 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 100-series (Core i7-6700TE) and 970,990FX,990X (FX-8370).

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	FX-8370
Socket	LGA1151	AM3+
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133+14%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB+100%	32 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	No	No
PCIe Lanes	16	20+25%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the FX-8370 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-6700TE) vs AMD-V (FX-8370). The Core i7-6700TE includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 530), while the FX-8370 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-6700TE targets Gaming, FX-8370 targets Legacy Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i7-6700TE rivals Ryzen 5 3600; FX-8370 rivals Core i5-6400.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	FX-8370
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	HD Graphics 530	None
Unlocked	No	Yes
AVX-512	No	No
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	AMD-V
Target Use	Gaming	Legacy Gaming

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-6700TE was priced at $303, while the FX-8370 came in at $199. On launch pricing ($303 vs $199), FX-8370 was $104 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-6700TE delivers 20.5 pts/$ vs 31.1 pts/$ for the FX-8370 — making the FX-8370 the 41.1% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-6700TE	FX-8370
MSRP	$303	$199-34%
Performance per Dollar	20.5	31.1+52%
Release Date	2015	2014

Search Core i7-6700TE on Amazon

Search FX-8370 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.