Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌90% higher power demand at 95W vs 50W.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 50W instead of 95W, a 45W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2440 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,447 vs 7,473).
❌Launch MSRP is still $363 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2440 v2 better than Xeon E5-2608L v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.3% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 4.7% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2440 v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2608L v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2440 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $363 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2608L v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2608L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,473 points. Launch price was $400.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2440 v2 and Xeon E5-2608L v4 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 40% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2440 v2. The Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2440 v2 scores 7,473 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2440 v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2440 v2	Xeon E5-2608L v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz+50%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	—
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,473	7,447