Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +8.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Draws 95W instead of 135W, a 40W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

2016

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2440 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,460 vs 7,473).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
❌42.1% higher power demand at 135W vs 95W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2440 v2 better than Xeon E5-2637 v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 8.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2440 v2 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2440 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 8.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2637 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,473 points. Launch price was $400.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

The Xeon E5-2637 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,460 points. Launch price was $996.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2440 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v4 — a 42.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2637 v4 (base: 1.9 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2440 v2 scores 7,473 against the Xeon E5-2637 v4's 7,460 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2440 v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2637 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2440 v2	Xeon E5-2637 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	2.4 GHz	3.7 GHz+54%
Base Clock	1.9 GHz	3.5 GHz+84%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)+100%	10 MB
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	1 MB+300%
Process	22 nm	14 nm-36%
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,473	7,460

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses the LGA1356 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.