Xeon E5-2603 v2
VS
A10-5700

Xeon E5-2603 v2 vs A10-5700

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
VS
AMD

A10-5700

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 4 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is positioned at rank 757 and the A10-5700 is on rank 448, so the A10-5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
15192%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2868%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2548%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1969%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
100%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
99%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
99%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
98%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
98%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
98%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
98%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
96%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
96%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
96%
#757
Xeon E5-2603 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#758
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
100%
#768
Xeon E3-1270L v4
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
#772
Xeon E3-1545M v5
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar A10-5700

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6809%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6434%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4671%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1407%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1115%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
975%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
559%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
551%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
502%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
502%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
496%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
483%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
476%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
474%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
470%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
98%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
98%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
98%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
98%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
98%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
98%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
97%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
97%
#448
A10-5700
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
100%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
99%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
99%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
99%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
98%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v2A10-5700
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Trinity (2012−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The A10-5700 ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($0 less, NaN% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v2A10-5700
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2603 v2 and A10-5700

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v2

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,735 points. Launch price was $240.

AMD

A10-5700

The A10-5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2014-01-01. It is based on the Trinity (2012−2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,747 points. Launch price was $130.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2603 v2 and A10-5700 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 versus 4 GHz on the A10-5700 — a 75.9% clock advantage for the A10-5700 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the A10-5700 uses Trinity (2012−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2603 v2 scores 2,735 against the A10-5700's 2,747 — a 0.4% lead for the A10-5700. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 vs 0 kB on the A10-5700.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2A10-5700
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
4 GHz+122%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.4 GHz+89%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
1 MB (per core)+300%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Trinity (2012−2013)
PassMark
2,735
2,747
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the A10-5700 uses FM2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2A10-5700
Socket
LGA2011
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
1866
Max RAM Capacity
64
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2603 v2) / true (A10-5700). The A10-5700 includes integrated graphics (Radeon HD 7660D), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: A10-5700 rivals Core i3-3220.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2A10-5700
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
Radeon HD 7660D
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true