Xeon E5-2603 v2
VS
FX-4130

Xeon E5-2603 v2 vs FX-4130

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
VS
AMD

FX-4130

4 Cores4 Thrd125 WWMax: 3.9 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is positioned at rank 757 and the FX-4130 is on rank 637, so the FX-4130 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
15192%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2868%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2548%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1969%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
100%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
99%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
99%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
98%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
98%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
98%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
98%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
96%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
96%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
96%
#757
Xeon E5-2603 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#758
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
100%
#768
Xeon E3-1270L v4
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
#772
Xeon E3-1545M v5
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar FX-4130

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
11469%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
10837%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7868%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2370%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1878%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1643%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
941%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
928%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
845%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
845%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
836%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
813%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
802%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
799%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
791%
#387
Ryzen Embedded V1807B
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#637
FX-4130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
100%
#638
Athlon II X2 280
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#639
FX-8300
MSRP: $197|Avg: $50
100%
#640
Celeron G540T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
100%
#641
Core i5-6600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $90
99%
#642
Core i5-4460
MSRP: $182|Avg: $40
99%
#645
Core i3-4170T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $17
99%
#646
FX-8370E
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
98%
#647
Core i5-4590S
MSRP: $192|Avg: $45
98%
#648
Pentium G2020
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
98%
#649
Pentium G3450
MSRP: $82|Avg: $25
98%
#650
Core i7-6700
MSRP: $303|Avg: $143
98%
#651
Athlon II X4 631
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
97%
#652
Pentium G3240T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $15
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($0) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v2FX-4130
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Zambezi (2011−2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The FX-4130 ($25), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($25 less, Infinity% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v2FX-4130
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($25)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2603 v2 and FX-4130

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v2

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,735 points. Launch price was $240.

AMD

FX-4130

The FX-4130 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 August 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Zambezi (2011−2012) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: AM3+. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,718 points. Launch price was $112.

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2603 v2 and FX-4130 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 versus 3.9 GHz on the FX-4130 — a 73.7% clock advantage for the FX-4130 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the FX-4130 uses Zambezi (2011−2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2603 v2 scores 2,735 against the FX-4130's 2,718 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2603 v2.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2FX-4130
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
3.9 GHz+117%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.8 GHz+111%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
4096 kB+1500%
Process
22 nm-31%
32 nm
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Zambezi (2011−2012)
PassMark
2,735
2,718
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the FX-4130 uses AM3+ (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2FX-4130
Socket
LGA2011
AM3+
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0+50%
PCIe 2.0