Xeon E5-2603 v2
VS
Celeron G4950

Xeon E5-2603 v2 vs Celeron G4950

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v2

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Celeron G4950

2 Cores2 Thrd54 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is positioned at rank #757 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2603 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
15192%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
2868%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
2548%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
1969%
#436
Xeon Gold 5218T
MSRP: $1572|Avg: $1349
100%
#437
Xeon 6960P
MSRP: $9625|Avg: $9625
99%
#438
EPYC 9555
MSRP: $9826|Avg: $7973
99%
#439
Xeon Gold 6338
MSRP: $2990|Avg: $1604
98%
#440
Xeon Gold 6538N
MSRP: $3351|Avg: $170
98%
#441
EPYC 7F52
MSRP: $3100|Avg: $1826
98%
#442
EPYC 7542
MSRP: $3400|Avg: $899
98%
#443
EPYC 9655
MSRP: $11852|Avg: $11852
96%
#444
Xeon 6781P
MSRP: $8960|Avg: $8960
96%
#445
Xeon Gold 6338N
MSRP: $3200|Avg: $3200
96%
#757
Xeon E5-2603 v2
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#758
Xeon E3-1281 v3
MSRP: $555|Avg: $636
100%
#768
Xeon E3-1270L v4
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
#772
Xeon E3-1545M v5
MSRP: $581|Avg: $636
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G4950

#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
108%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
107%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
105%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
105%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
104%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
104%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
104%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
104%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
103%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
103%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
103%
#362
Core i9-14901E
MSRP: $557|Avg: $689
102%
#363
Celeron G5900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $50
102%
#364
Celeron G6900TE
MSRP: $53|Avg: $64
101%
#365
Core i5-8600T
MSRP: $213|Avg: $213
100%
#366
Celeron G4950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $63
100%
#367
Core i9-10900E
MSRP: $488|Avg: $450
100%
#368
Core i7-9700KF
MSRP: $374|Avg: $333
99%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
96%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
96%
#371
Core 5 120UL
MSRP: $277|Avg: $270
91%
#372
Ryzen Embedded V3C14
MSRP: $305|Avg: $305
90%
#373
Core i7-9700T
MSRP: $323|Avg: $276
89%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
86%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
84%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
83%
#377
Core i3-9100HL
MSRP: $225|Avg: $100
80%
#378
Core i9-12900TE
MSRP: $494|Avg: $664
80%
#379
Core i9-9940X
MSRP: $1387|Avg: $850
77%
#380
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX
MSRP: $1899|Avg: $1836
76%
#381
Ryzen Embedded V1756B
MSRP: $250|Avg: $250
75%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron G4950 (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2400, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v2Celeron G4950
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2603 v2Celeron G4950
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($63)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2603 v2 and Celeron G4950

Intel

Xeon E5-2603 v2

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,735 points. Launch price was $240.

Intel

Celeron G4950

The Celeron G4950 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 2,714 points. Launch price was $52.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron G4950 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Xeon E5-2603 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 versus 3.3 GHz on the Celeron G4950 — a 58.8% clock advantage for the Celeron G4950 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Celeron G4950 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2603 v2 scores 2,735 against the Celeron G4950's 2,714 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2603 v2. L3 cache: 10 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2603 v2 vs 2 MB on the Celeron G4950.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2Celeron G4950
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
3.3 GHz+83%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
3.3 GHz+83%
L3 Cache
10 MB (total)+400%
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
512 kB+100%
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Coffee Lake (2017−2019)
PassMark
2,735
2,714
Geekbench 6 Single
672
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,229
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2603 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Celeron G4950 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2Celeron G4950
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1151
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2603 v2) / VT-x (Celeron G4950). The Celeron G4950 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Xeon E5-2603 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G4950 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G4950 rivals Pentium G5420.

FeatureXeon E5-2603 v2Celeron G4950
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget