Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Core i5-8400H
Xeon E5-2608L v4
Core i5-8400H
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is positioned at rank 529 and the Core i5-8400H is on rank 142, so the Core i5-8400H offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2608L v4
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-8400H
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2608L v4 | Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($174) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2608L v4 | Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($174) | ✅ More affordable ($0) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Core i5-8400H
Xeon E5-2608L v4
The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.
Core i5-8400H
The Core i5-8400H is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,456 points. Launch price was $250.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2608L v4 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-8400H offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 versus 4.2 GHz on the Core i5-8400H — a 89.7% clock advantage for the Core i5-8400H. The Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i5-8400H uses Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2608L v4 scores 7,447 against the Core i5-8400H's 7,456 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i5-8400H. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-8400H.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2608L v4 | Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 1.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz+163% |
| Base Clock | — | 2.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB+67% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Coffee Lake-H (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 7,447 | 7,456 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,657 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,493 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 4,963 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2608L v4) / true (Core i5-8400H). The Core i5-8400H includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-8400H targets Mobile.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2608L v4 | Core i5-8400H |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | true |
| Target Use | — | Mobile |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Core i5-8400H
