Xeon E5-2608L v4
VS
Xeon E5-2667

Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Xeon E5-2667

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

8 Cores16 Thrd50 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2667

6 Cores12 Thrd130 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2012

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is positioned at rank 529 and the Xeon E5-2667 is on rank 991, so the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2608L v4

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8370%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7909%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5743%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1730%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1370%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1199%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
687%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
678%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
617%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
617%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
610%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
594%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
585%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
583%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
578%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
100%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
96%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
100%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
98%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
97%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
96%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
94%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
94%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
43296%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
8175%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
7263%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
5611%
#537
Xeon Platinum 8180
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2363
80%
#538
Xeon Platinum 8280M
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $6223
78%
#539
Xeon Platinum 8280
MSRP: $10009|Avg: $2940
77%
#991
Xeon E5-2667
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $31
100%
#992
Xeon E5-2690
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $150
99%
#993
Xeon E3-1565L v5
MSRP: $1552|Avg: $120
98%
#994
Xeon L5640
MSRP: $996|Avg: N/A
98%
#995
Xeon E5-4627 v2
MSRP: $2061|Avg: $70
95%
#996
Xeon L5335
MSRP: $380|Avg: $18
95%
#997
Xeon E-2144G
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $389
94%
#998
Xeon X5675
MSRP: $1440|Avg: $22
93%
#999
Xeon Phi 7210
MSRP: $1881|Avg: $150
81%
#1000
Xeon D-1567
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
81%
#1001
Xeon E-2126G
MSRP: $2702|Avg: $230
80%
#1004
Xeon D-1531
MSRP: $2057|Avg: $250
78%
#1005
Xeon 5130
MSRP: $316|Avg: $10
78%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Xeon E5-2667 leads in gaming performance. However, the Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightXeon E5-2608L v4Xeon E5-2667
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($174)
More affordable ($31)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Xeon E5-2667 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 82% cheaper ($31 vs $174) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightXeon E5-2608L v4Xeon E5-2667
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+461%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($174)
More affordable ($31)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2608L v4 and Xeon E5-2667

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

Intel

Xeon E5-2667

The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — a 74.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2667. The Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2608L v4 scores 7,447 against the Xeon E5-2667's 7,442 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2608L v4. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667.

FeatureXeon E5-2608L v4Xeon E5-2667
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
1.6 GHz
3.5 GHz+119%
Base Clock
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB+33%
15360 kB (total)
L2 Cache
2 MB+700%
256 kB (per core)
Process
14 nm-56%
32 nm
Architecture
Broadwell (2015−2019)
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark
7,447
7,442
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2608L v4) / true (Xeon E5-2667). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.

FeatureXeon E5-2608L v4Xeon E5-2667
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
true
Target Use
Server
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 launched at $363 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2667 debuted at $1552. At current prices ($174 vs $31), the Xeon E5-2667 is $143 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2608L v4 delivers 42.8 pts/$ vs 240.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 — making the Xeon E5-2667 the 139.5% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2608L v4Xeon E5-2667
MSRP
$363-77%
$1552
Avg Price (30d)
$174
$31-82%
Performance per Dollar
42.8
240.1+461%
Release Date
2016
2012