Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 50W, a 5W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2608L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,441 vs 7,447).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 20.5 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $363 MSRP).

Xeon E5-2608L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +10.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($363 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
✅Delivers 19.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 20.5 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($363 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2608L v4 better than Xeon E3-1505M v6?

Yes. Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.1% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 10.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2608L v4 comes in $71 cheaper on MSRP at $363 MSRP versus $434 MSRP, and it still gives you a 10.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 19.7% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 17.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1505M v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2608L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,441 points. Launch price was $623.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 85.7% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1505M v6. The Xeon E3-1505M v6 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1505M v6 scores 7,441 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0.1% lead for the Xeon E5-2608L v4. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v6	Xeon E5-2608L v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+150%	1.6 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz	—
L3 Cache	8 MB	20 MB+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB	2 MB+100%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,441	7,447

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E3-1505M v6 was priced at $434, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 came in at $363. On launch pricing ($434 vs $363), Xeon E5-2608L v4 was $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1505M v6 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 20.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — making the Xeon E5-2608L v4 the 17.9% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v6	Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP	$434	$363-16%
Performance per Dollar	17.1	20.5+20%
Release Date	2017	2016

Search Xeon E3-1505M v6 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2608L v4 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.