Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E3-1505M v6

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E3-1505M v6 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E3-1505M v6: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7820EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $56 less on MSRP ($378 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
✅Delivers 15.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($378 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,441 vs 7,470).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 17.1 vs 19.8 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $378 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820EQ better than Xeon E3-1505M v6?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E3-1505M v6 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7820EQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820EQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-7820EQ comes in $56 cheaper on MSRP at $378 MSRP versus $434 MSRP, and it still gives you 0.4% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E3-1505M v6 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 2.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 15.3% better value on MSRP (19.8 vs 17.1 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7820EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E3-1505M v6 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,441 points. Launch price was $623.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7820EQ and Xeon E3-1505M v6 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 — a 25.4% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1505M v6. Both are built on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Core i7-7820EQ scores 7,470 against the Xeon E3-1505M v6's 7,441 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i7-7820EQ. Both processors carry 8 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i7-7820EQ	Xeon E3-1505M v6
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	4 GHz+29%
Base Clock	—	3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	8 MB
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
PassMark	7,470	7,441

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i7-7820EQ was priced at $378, while the Xeon E3-1505M v6 came in at $434. On launch pricing ($378 vs $434), Core i7-7820EQ was $56 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820EQ delivers 19.8 pts/$ vs 17.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E3-1505M v6 — making the Core i7-7820EQ the 14.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i7-7820EQ	Xeon E3-1505M v6
MSRP	$378-13%	$434
Performance per Dollar	19.8+16%	17.1
Release Date	2017	2017

Search Core i7-7820EQ on Amazon

Search Xeon E3-1505M v6 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.