Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E5-2637 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E5-2637 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-7820EQ

2017

Why buy it

✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 135W, a 90W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2637 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 10 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $378 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2637 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +9.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,460 vs 7,470).
❌200% higher power demand at 135W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i7-7820EQ better than Xeon E5-2637 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2637 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-7820EQ is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-7820EQ is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i7-7820EQ is the better buy right now. Core i7-7820EQ comes in at an unclear MSRP at $378 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2637 v4 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 9.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (19.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-7820EQ makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

The Xeon E5-2637 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,460 points. Launch price was $996.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i7-7820EQ and Xeon E5-2637 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v4 — a 17.6% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2637 v4. The Core i7-7820EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820EQ scores 7,470 against the Xeon E5-2637 v4's 7,460 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i7-7820EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2637 v4.

Feature	Core i7-7820EQ	Xeon E5-2637 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz	3.7 GHz+19%
Base Clock	—	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	10 MB+25%
L2 Cache	1 MB	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,470	7,460