Core i7-7820EQ
VS
Xeon E5-2608L v4

Core i7-7820EQ vs Xeon E5-2608L v4

Intel

Core i7-7820EQ

4 Cores8 Thrd45 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2017
VS
Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

8 Cores16 Thrd50 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2016

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Core i7-7820EQ is positioned at rank 889 and the Xeon E5-2608L v4 is on rank 529, so the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-7820EQ

#877
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
1485%
#878
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
1463%
#879
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
1343%
#880
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
1337%
#881
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
1325%
#883
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
1279%
#884
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
1227%
#885
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
1225%
#886
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
1192%
#889
Core i7-7820EQ
MSRP: $378|Avg: $378
100%
#890
Celeron 7305
MSRP: $128|Avg: $107
100%
#891
E-300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $20
99%
#892
Core i7-7820HK
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#895
Pentium B940
MSRP: $134|Avg: $11
99%
#896
Core i5-8305G
MSRP: $350|Avg: $350
98%
#897
Celeron 6305
MSRP: $107|Avg: $80
98%
#900
Core i7-8705G
MSRP: $400|Avg: $400
97%
#902
Pentium Dual Core T2410
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
96%
#903
FX-8800P
MSRP: $150|Avg: $45
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2608L v4

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8370%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7909%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5743%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1730%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1370%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1199%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
687%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
678%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
617%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
617%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
610%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
594%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
585%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
583%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
578%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
100%
#375
Ryzen Embedded V2546
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
98%
#376
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7945WX
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $1399
96%
#529
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
100%
#531
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
99%
#532
Core i3-7100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $40
99%
#533
Celeron G1620T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $15
98%
#536
Pentium G4400T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $75
97%
#539
Athlon X4 850
MSRP: $77|Avg: $20
96%
#541
FX-6350
MSRP: $132|Avg: $55
94%
#542
Celeron G470
MSRP: $35|Avg: $10
94%
#543
Pentium G3220
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i7-7820EQ (2017) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3L-1600, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightCore i7-7820EQXeon E5-2608L v4
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($174)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Kaby Lake (2016−2019) / 14 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 (2016) relies on 14 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightCore i7-7820EQXeon E5-2608L v4
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+117%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($378)
More affordable ($174)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Core i7-7820EQ and Xeon E5-2608L v4

Intel

Core i7-7820EQ

The Core i7-7820EQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1600. Passmark benchmark score: 7,470 points. Launch price was $378.

Intel

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

Processing Power

The Core i7-7820EQ packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Core i7-7820EQ versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — a 63.8% clock advantage for the Core i7-7820EQ. The Core i7-7820EQ uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-7820EQ scores 7,470 against the Xeon E5-2608L v4's 7,447 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-7820EQ. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Core i7-7820EQ vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4.

FeatureCore i7-7820EQXeon E5-2608L v4
Cores / Threads
4 / 8
8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+94%
1.6 GHz
L3 Cache
8 MB
20 MB+150%
L2 Cache
1 MB
2 MB+100%
Process
14 nm
14 nm
Architecture
Kaby Lake (2016−2019)
Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark
7,470
7,447
💰

Value Analysis

The Core i7-7820EQ launched at $378 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2608L v4 debuted at $363. At current prices ($378 vs $174), the Xeon E5-2608L v4 is $204 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i7-7820EQ delivers 19.8 pts/$ vs 42.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2608L v4 — making the Xeon E5-2608L v4 the 73.6% better value option.

FeatureCore i7-7820EQXeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP
$378
$363-4%
Avg Price (30d)
$378
$174-54%
Performance per Dollar
19.8
42.8+116%
Release Date
2017
2016