Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2667

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2667 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2667: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,118 less on MSRP ($434 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Delivers 257.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 17.1 vs 4.8 PassMark/$ ($434 MSRP vs $1,552 MSRP).
✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,441 vs 7,442).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 15 MB).

Xeon E5-2667

2012

Why buy it

✅+0% higher PassMark.
✅+87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 4.8 vs 17.1 PassMark/$ ($1,552 MSRP vs $434 MSRP).
❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E3-1505M v6 better than Xeon E5-2667?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E3-1505M v6 is ahead with a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2667 pulls ahead with 0% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2667 also has the bigger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2667 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 87.5% larger total L3 cache (15 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E3-1505M v6 is the better buy right now. Xeon E3-1505M v6 comes in $1,118 cheaper on MSRP at $434 MSRP versus $1,552 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.3% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2667 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0% better PassMark. It is also 257.6% better value on MSRP (17.1 vs 4.8 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1505M v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2012). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2667 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,441 points. Launch price was $623.

Xeon E5-2667

The Xeon E5-2667 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 15360 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,442 points. Launch price was $714.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 versus 3.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 — a 13.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1505M v6 (base: 3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E3-1505M v6 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1505M v6 scores 7,441 against the Xeon E5-2667's 7,442 — a 0% lead for the Xeon E5-2667. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs 15360 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v6	Xeon E5-2667
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+14%	3.5 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+3%	2.9 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	15360 kB (total)+88%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-56%	32 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	7,441	7,442

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v6	Xeon E5-2667
Socket	BGA1440	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0+50%	PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR3 1600 MHz
Max RAM Capacity	—	384 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E3-1505M v6) / true (Xeon E5-2667). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2667 targets Server.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v6	Xeon E5-2667
Integrated GPU	—	No
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	No
Virtualization	—	true
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E3-1505M v6 was priced at $434, while the Xeon E5-2667 came in at $1552. On launch pricing ($434 vs $1552), Xeon E3-1505M v6 was $1118 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E3-1505M v6 delivers 17.1 pts/$ vs 4.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 — making the Xeon E3-1505M v6 the 112.6% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v6	Xeon E5-2667
MSRP	$434-72%	$1552
Performance per Dollar	17.1+256%	4.8
Release Date	2017	2012

Search Xeon E3-1505M v6 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2667 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.