Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

2017

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 95W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2440 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (7,441 vs 7,473).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $434 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2440 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +15.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌111.1% higher power demand at 95W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2440 v2 better than Xeon E3-1505M v6?

Yes. Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 15.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 15.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2440 v2 is the easy recommendation for a fresh desktop build. Xeon E5-2440 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $434 MSRP, and it still gives you a 15.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E3-1505M v6 only looks good on raw value math because it is a cheap legacy laptop chip, not because it is a real desktop gaming recommendation. It simply does not keep up in modern games, especially when the gap is already 15.2% in the shared gaming data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E3-1505M v6 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs Xeon E5-2440 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E3-1505M v6

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 7,441 points. Launch price was $623.

Xeon E5-2440 v2

The Xeon E5-2440 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1356. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 7,473 points. Launch price was $400.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2440 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2440 v2 — a 50% clock advantage for the Xeon E3-1505M v6 (base: 3 GHz vs 1.9 GHz). The Xeon E3-1505M v6 uses the Kaby Lake (2016−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E3-1505M v6 scores 7,441 against the Xeon E5-2440 v2's 7,473 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2440 v2. L3 cache: 8 MB on the Xeon E3-1505M v6 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2440 v2.

Feature	Xeon E3-1505M v6	Xeon E5-2440 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+67%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+58%	1.9 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB	20 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	1 MB+300%	256 kB (per core)
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Kaby Lake (2016−2019)	Ivy Bridge-EN (2013−2014)
PassMark	7,441	7,473

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E3-1505M v6 uses the BGA1440 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2440 v2 uses LGA1356 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.