Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).
✅Draws 50W instead of 135W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (7,447 vs 7,460).
❌Launch MSRP is still $363 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2637 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.2% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2608L v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (10 MB vs 20 MB).
❌170% higher power demand at 135W vs 50W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2608L v4 better than Xeon E5-2637 v4?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon E5-2608L v4 is ahead with a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v4 pulls ahead with 0.2% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2608L v4 also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 10 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2637 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2608L v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2608L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $363 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2637 v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.2% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (20.5 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2637 v4 is the safer long-term CPU choice because it gives you more room to grow and a better platform outlook.

Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs Xeon E5-2637 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2608L v4

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Max frequency: 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 50 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 7,447 points. Launch price was $363.

Xeon E5-2637 v4

The Xeon E5-2637 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 7,460 points. Launch price was $996.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2608L v4 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2637 v4 offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2608L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 versus 3.7 GHz on the Xeon E5-2637 v4 — a 79.2% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2637 v4. Both are built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2608L v4 scores 7,447 against the Xeon E5-2637 v4's 7,460 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2637 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2608L v4 vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2637 v4.

Feature	Xeon E5-2608L v4	Xeon E5-2637 v4
Cores / Threads	8 / 16+100%	4 / 8
Boost Clock	1.6 GHz	3.7 GHz+131%
Base Clock	—	3.5 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB+100%	10 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB+100%	1 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	7,447	7,460