Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2658

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2658 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2658: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2620 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (15 MB vs 20 MB).

Xeon E5-2658

2012

Why buy it

✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 15 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,232 vs 6,251).
❌Launch MSRP is still $400 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2620 v2 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 v2 better than Xeon E5-2658?

Yes. Xeon E5-2620 v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2620 v2 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 1.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2620 v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2658 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2620 v2 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $400 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2658 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (15.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2620 v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2013 vs 2012) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs Xeon E5-2658 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2620 v2

The Xeon E5-2620 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 15 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,251 points. Launch price was $417.

Xeon E5-2658

The Xeon E5-2658 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,232 points. Launch price was $1,462.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2620 v2 packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2658 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2658 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v2 versus 2.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2658 — a 8% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2620 v2 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Xeon E5-2620 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2658 uses Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2620 v2 scores 6,251 against the Xeon E5-2658's 6,232 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v2. L3 cache: 15 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2620 v2 vs 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2658.

Feature	Xeon E5-2620 v2	Xeon E5-2658
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	2.6 GHz+8%	2.4 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	15 MB (total)	20480 kB (total)+33%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm-31%	32 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
PassMark	6,251	6,232