Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4108

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4108 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4108: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2620 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Xeon Silver 4108

2017

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,177 vs 9,255).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (11 MB vs 20 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 v4 better than Xeon Silver 4108?

Yes. Xeon E5-2620 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.8% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 81.8% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 11 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2620 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2620 v4 comes in in basically the same MSRP band at $417 MSRP versus $417 MSRP, and it still gives you a 1.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 0.8% better value on MSRP (22.2 vs 22.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Silver 4108 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2017 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs Xeon Silver 4108 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2620 v4

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.

Xeon Silver 4108

The Xeon Silver 4108 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 11 July 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 11 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 9,177 points. Launch price was $417.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2620 v4 and Xeon Silver 4108 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon Silver 4108 — identical boost frequencies (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses Skylake (server) (2017−2018) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2620 v4 scores 9,255 against the Xeon Silver 4108's 9,177 — a 0.8% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v4. L3 cache: 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 vs 11 MB on the Xeon Silver 4108.

Feature	Xeon E5-2620 v4	Xeon Silver 4108
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	3 GHz	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz+17%	1.8 GHz
L3 Cache	20 MB+82%	11 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB	8 MB+300%
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
PassMark	9,255	9,177

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon Silver 4108 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Xeon E5-2620 v4	Xeon Silver 4108
Socket	LGA2011	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-2133	—
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2620 v4 was priced at $417, while the Xeon Silver 4108 came in at $417. On launch pricing ($417 vs $417), Xeon Silver 4108 was $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2620 v4 delivers 22.2 pts/$ vs 22.0 pts/$ for the Xeon Silver 4108 — making the Xeon E5-2620 v4 the 0.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2620 v4	Xeon Silver 4108
MSRP	$417	$417
Performance per Dollar	22.2	22.0
Release Date	2016	2017

Search Xeon E5-2620 v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon Silver 4108 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.