Core i7-1068NG7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i7-1068NG7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i7-1068NG7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i7-1068NG7

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 28W instead of 85W, a 57W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,240 vs 9,255).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2620 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Core i7-1068NG7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌203.6% higher power demand at 85W vs 28W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2620 v4 better than Core i7-1068NG7?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2620 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i7-1068NG7 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2620 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 13.1% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2620 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.2% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2620 v4 is the better buy right now. Xeon E5-2620 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at $417 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 13.1% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (22.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i7-1068NG7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i7-1068NG7 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i7-1068NG7

The Core i7-1068NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1344. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 9,240 points. Launch price was $320.

Xeon E5-2620 v4

The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i7-1068NG7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-1068NG7 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — a 31% clock advantage for the Core i7-1068NG7 (base: 2.3 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Core i7-1068NG7 uses the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i7-1068NG7 scores 9,240 against the Xeon E5-2620 v4's 9,255 — a 0.2% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-1068NG7 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4.

Feature	Core i7-1068NG7	Xeon E5-2620 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+37%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.3 GHz+10%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	20 MB+150%
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	2 MB+700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Ice Lake-U (2019−2020)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	9,240	9,255

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i7-1068NG7 uses the FCBGA1344 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i7-1068NG7	Xeon E5-2620 v4
Socket	FCBGA1344	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	—	DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity	—	1536 GB
RAM Channels	—	4
ECC Support	—	Yes
PCIe Lanes	—	40