Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-1068NG7

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-1068NG7 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-1068NG7: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1145G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.2% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i7-1068NG7 needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Core i7-1068NG7

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1145G7 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (9,240 vs 9,266).
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1145G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1145G7 better than Core i7-1068NG7?

Yes. Core i5-1145G7 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i5-1145G7 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i5-1145G7 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1145G7 still makes the most sense overall. Core i5-1145G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1145G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-1068NG7 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1145G7

The Core i5-1145G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,266 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i7-1068NG7

The Core i7-1068NG7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1344. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200, LPDDR4-3733. Passmark benchmark score: 9,240 points. Launch price was $320.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Core i5-1145G7 and Core i7-1068NG7 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1145G7 versus 4.1 GHz on the Core i7-1068NG7 — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Core i5-1145G7 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Core i5-1145G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-1068NG7 uses Ice Lake-U (2019−2020) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1145G7 scores 9,266 against the Core i7-1068NG7's 9,240 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i5-1145G7. Both processors carry 8 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Core i5-1145G7	Core i7-1068NG7
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+7%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz+13%	2.3 GHz
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	8 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin	10 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Ice Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark	9,266	9,240
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,195	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,653	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,764	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1145G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-1068NG7 uses FCBGA1344 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1145G7	Core i7-1068NG7
Socket	FCBGA1449	FCBGA1344
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1145G7) / not specified (Core i7-1068NG7). The Core i5-1145G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core i7-1068NG7 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1145G7 targets Business. Direct competitor: Core i5-1145G7 rivals Core i5-1135G7.