Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-4930K

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-4930K FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-4930K: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i5-1145G7

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 28W instead of 130W, a 102W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU), while Core i7-4930K needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (9,266 vs 9,379).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 12 MB).

Core i7-4930K

2013

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i5-1145G7 across 29 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Launch MSRP is still $670 MSRP, while Core i5-1145G7 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌364.3% higher power demand at 130W vs 28W.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i5-1145G7 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i5-1145G7 better than Core i7-4930K?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Core i5-1145G7 is ahead with a 4.4% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4930K pulls ahead with 1.2% better PassMark. Core i7-4930K also has the bigger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i7-4930K is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (12 MB vs 8 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i5-1145G7 is still the much better call for a fresh build. Core i5-1145G7 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $670 MSRP, and it still gives you a 4.4% average FPS lead across 29 shared CPU game tests in our data. Core i7-4930K only looks stronger on raw value math because it is extremely cheap, but that usually means used-market pricing on an obsolete 2013 platform. Even with 100.0% better value on paper (14.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), it really only makes sense as a cheap stopgap or a niche existing-platform option for someone already on LGA2011.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i5-1145G7 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2013). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Core i5-1145G7 vs Core i7-4930K Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i5-1145G7

The Core i5-1145G7 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 September 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm SuperFin process technology. Socket: FCBGA1449. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 9,266 points. Launch price was $309.

Core i7-4930K

The Core i7-4930K is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-E (2013) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 9,379 points. Launch price was $670.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i5-1145G7 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Core i7-4930K offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Core i7-4930K has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Core i5-1145G7 versus 3.9 GHz on the Core i7-4930K — a 12% clock advantage for the Core i5-1145G7 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i5-1145G7 uses the Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021) architecture (10 nm SuperFin), while the Core i7-4930K uses Ivy Bridge-E (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i5-1145G7 scores 9,266 against the Core i7-4930K's 9,379 — a 1.2% lead for the Core i7-4930K. L3 cache: 8 MB (total) on the Core i5-1145G7 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i7-4930K.

Feature	Core i5-1145G7	Core i7-4930K
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	6 / 12+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+13%	3.9 GHz
Base Clock	2.6 GHz	3.4 GHz+31%
L3 Cache	8 MB (total)	12 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	10 nm SuperFin-55%	22 nm
Architecture	Tiger Lake-UP3 (2020−2021)	Ivy Bridge-E (2013)
PassMark	9,266	9,379+1%
Cinebench R23 Multi	5,195	—
Geekbench 6 Single	1,653	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	4,764	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i5-1145G7 uses the FCBGA1449 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Core i7-4930K uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Core i5-1145G7	Core i7-4930K
Socket	FCBGA1449	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0+33%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	—
Max RAM Capacity	64 GB	—
RAM Channels	2	—
ECC Support	No	—
PCIe Lanes	16	—

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-1145G7) / not specified (Core i7-4930K). The Core i5-1145G7 includes integrated graphics (Iris Xe Graphics (80 EU)), while the Core i7-4930K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-1145G7 targets Business. Direct competitor: Core i5-1145G7 rivals Core i5-1135G7.