Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs Ryzen 5 3600
Xeon E5-2630 v4
Ryzen 5 3600
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is positioned at rank #877 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2630 v4
Performance Per Dollar Ryzen 5 3600
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2630 v4 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($130) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Broadwell (2015−2019) / 14 nm) | ✨ Modern (Matisse (2019−2020) / 7 nm, 12 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2630 v4 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+151%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($130) | ✅ More affordable ($80) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Ryzen 5 3600
Xeon E5-2630 v4
The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.
Ryzen 5 3600
The Ryzen 5 3600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019−2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 17,685 points. Launch price was $199.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2630 v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Ryzen 5 3600 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen 5 3600 — a 30.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 3600 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses Matisse (2019−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2630 v4 scores 11,434 against the Ryzen 5 3600's 17,685 — a 42.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,032 vs 1,295, a 22.6% lead for the Ryzen 5 3600 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 5,368 vs 1,898 (95.5% advantage for the Xeon E5-2630 v4). L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs 32 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2630 v4 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 10 / 20+67% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.1 GHz | 4.2 GHz+35% |
| Base Clock | 2.2 GHz | 3.6 GHz+64% |
| L3 Cache | 25 MB | 32 MB (total)+28% |
| L2 Cache | 2.5 MB+400% | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Broadwell (2015−2019) | Matisse (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 11,434 | 17,685+55% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,032 | 1,295+25% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 5,368+183% | 1,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 5 3600 uses AM4 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 1600/1866/2133 on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 versus DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 3600 — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 supports 200% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 169.2% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2630 v4) vs 2 (Ryzen 5 3600). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2630 v4) vs 24 (Ryzen 5 3600) — the Xeon E5-2630 v4 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: C612 (Xeon E5-2630 v4) and AMD B550,AMD X570,AMD B450,AMD X470 (Ryzen 5 3600).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2630 v4 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4 1600/1866/2133 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 1536 GB+1100% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+67% | 24 |
Advanced Features
Only the Ryzen 5 3600 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4) vs Yes (Ryzen 5 3600). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server, Ryzen 5 3600 targets Gaming/Budget Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 3600 rivals Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2630 v4 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | Yes |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x / VT-d / EPT | Yes |
| Target Use | Workstation / Server | Gaming/Budget Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2630 v4 launched at $1171 MSRP, while the Ryzen 5 3600 debuted at $199. At current prices ($130 vs $80), the Ryzen 5 3600 is $50 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2630 v4 delivers 88.0 pts/$ vs 221.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen 5 3600 — making the Ryzen 5 3600 the 86.1% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2630 v4 | Ryzen 5 3600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1171 | $199-83% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $130 | $80-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 88.0 | 221.1+151% |
| Release Date | 2016 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Ryzen 5 3600
