Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs Xeon E5-2650 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs Xeon E5-2650 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2630 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 85W instead of 105W, a 20W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2650 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (11,434 vs 11,662).
❌Launch MSRP is still $1,171 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2650 v3 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2650 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌23.5% higher power demand at 105W vs 85W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2650 v3 better than Xeon E5-2630 v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-2650 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 2% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2650 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 3.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2650 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 2% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2650 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2630 v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2650 v3 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $1,171 MSRP, and it still gives you a 3.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2630 v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (9.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2630 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs Xeon E5-2650 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2630 v4

The Xeon E5-2630 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,434 points. Launch price was $667.

Xeon E5-2650 v3

The Xeon E5-2650 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 105 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,662 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2630 v4 and Xeon E5-2650 v3 share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 — a 3.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2630 v4 (base: 2.2 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Xeon E5-2630 v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2650 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2630 v4 scores 11,434 against the Xeon E5-2650 v3's 11,662 — a 2% lead for the Xeon E5-2650 v3. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650 v3.

Feature	Xeon E5-2630 v4	Xeon E5-2650 v3
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	10 / 20
Boost Clock	3.1 GHz+3%	3 GHz
Base Clock	2.2 GHz	2.3 GHz+5%
L3 Cache	25 MB	25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB	256K (per core)+10140%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	11,434	11,662+2%
Geekbench 6 Single	1,032	—
Geekbench 6 Multi	5,368	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 4.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4 1600/1866/2133 on the Xeon E5-2630 v4 versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2650 v3 — the Xeon E5-2650 v3 supports 33.3% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2630 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 768 GB — 100% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: C612 (Xeon E5-2630 v4) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2650 v3).

Feature	Xeon E5-2630 v4	Xeon E5-2650 v3
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4 1600/1866/2133	DDR4-2133+33%
Max RAM Capacity	1536 GB+100%	768 GB
RAM Channels	4	4
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	40	40

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x / VT-d / EPT (Xeon E5-2630 v4) / not specified (Xeon E5-2650 v3). Primary use case: Xeon E5-2630 v4 targets Workstation / Server.