Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon Platinum 8481C

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon Platinum 8481C FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon Platinum 8481C: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+1.4% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 75W instead of 350W, a 275W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon Platinum 8481C across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Xeon Platinum 8481C

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +4.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (11,681 vs 11,839).
❌366.7% higher power demand at 350W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2648L v4 better than Xeon Platinum 8481C?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, Xeon Platinum 8481C is ahead with a 4.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L v4 pulls ahead with 1.4% better PassMark. Xeon Platinum 8481C also has the bigger cache pool with 200% larger total L3 cache (105 MB vs 35 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2648L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.4% better PassMark, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2648L v4 still makes the most sense overall. Xeon E5-2648L v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.4% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon Platinum 8481C makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2016), a healthier platform with LGA4677 and DDR5 instead of the older platform, and 3D V-Cache and a much larger 105 MB L3 cache instead of 35 MB. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs Xeon Platinum 8481C Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2648L v4

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 35 MB. L2 cache: 3.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 11,839 points. Launch price was $1,544.

Xeon Platinum 8481C

The Xeon Platinum 8481C is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) architecture. It features 56 cores and 112 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 105 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4677. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 11,681 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2648L v4 packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Xeon Platinum 8481C offers 56 cores / 112 threads — the Xeon Platinum 8481C has 42 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon Platinum 8481C — a 71.4% clock advantage for the Xeon Platinum 8481C. The Xeon E5-2648L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon Platinum 8481C uses Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2648L v4 scores 11,839 against the Xeon Platinum 8481C's 11,681 — a 1.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2648L v4. L3 cache: 35 MB on the Xeon E5-2648L v4 vs 105 MB on the Xeon Platinum 8481C.

Feature	Xeon E5-2648L v4	Xeon Platinum 8481C
Cores / Threads	14 / 28	56 / 112+300%
Boost Clock	1.8 GHz	3.8 GHz+111%
Base Clock	—	2 GHz
L3 Cache	35 MB	105 MB+200%
L2 Cache	3.5 MB+75%	2 MB (per core)
Process	14 nm	10 nm-29%
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Sapphire Rapids (2023−2024)
PassMark	11,839+1%	11,681