Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs Core i5-10400
Xeon E5-2650L v3
Core i5-10400
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2650L v3 is positioned at rank #899 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650L v3
Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650L v3 | Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,329) | ✅ More affordable ($175) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) | ✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650L v3 | Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+667%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($1,329) | ✅ More affordable ($175) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Core i5-10400
Xeon E5-2650L v3
The Xeon E5-2650L v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 11,865 points. Launch price was $800.
Core i5-10400
The Core i5-10400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,988 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2650L v3 packs 12 cores / 24 threads, while the Core i5-10400 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L v3 has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L v3 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400 — a 52.9% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650L v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-10400 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650L v3 scores 11,865 against the Core i5-10400's 11,988 — a 1% lead for the Core i5-10400. L3 cache: 30 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L v3 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L v3 | Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 12 / 24+100% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 2.5 GHz | 4.3 GHz+72% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.9 GHz+61% |
| L3 Cache | 30 MB (total)+150% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 14 nm-36% |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Comet Lake (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 11,865 | 11,988+1% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 8,313 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2650L v3 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i5-10400 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-2133 memory speed. The Xeon E5-2650L v3 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2650L v3) vs 2 (Core i5-10400). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2650L v3) vs 16 (Core i5-10400) — the Xeon E5-2650L v3 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L v3 | Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1200 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133 | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB+500% | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40+150% | 16 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5-2650L v3) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400). The Core i5-10400 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2650L v3 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E5-2650L v3 targets Server Low Power, Core i5-10400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400 rivals Ryzen 5 3600.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L v3 | Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Server Low Power | Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2650L v3 launched at $1329 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400 debuted at $182.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L v3 | Core i5-10400 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $1329 | $182-86% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $175 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2650L v3 and Core i5-10400
