Xeon E5-2650L vs Core i3-8100
Xeon E5-2650L
Core i3-8100
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2650L is positioned at rank 916 and the Core i3-8100 is on rank 410, so the Core i3-8100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650L
Performance Per Dollar Core i3-8100
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($129) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | ✨ Modern (Coffee Lake (2017−2019) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+188%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($129) | ✅ More affordable ($45) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650L and Core i3-8100
Xeon E5-2650L
The Xeon E5-2650L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,055 points. Launch price was $142.
Core i3-8100
The Core i3-8100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 5 October 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake (2017−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 6,073 points. Launch price was $117.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2650L packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i3-8100 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L versus 3.6 GHz on the Core i3-8100 — a 44.1% clock advantage for the Core i3-8100 (base: 1.8 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650L uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i3-8100 uses Coffee Lake (2017−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650L scores 6,055 against the Core i3-8100's 6,073 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i3-8100. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i3-8100.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.6 GHz+57% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 3.6 GHz+100% |
| L3 Cache | 20480 kB (total)+233% | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 14 nm-56% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Coffee Lake (2017−2019) |
| PassMark | 6,055 | 6,073 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,600 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2650L uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i3-8100 uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2400 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2650L) / VT-x, VT-d (Core i3-8100). The Core i3-8100 includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2650L requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-8100 targets Budget Desktop.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 630 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Budget Desktop |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2650L launched at $748 MSRP, while the Core i3-8100 debuted at $117. At current prices ($129 vs $45), the Core i3-8100 is $84 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2650L delivers 46.9 pts/$ vs 135.0 pts/$ for the Core i3-8100 — making the Core i3-8100 the 96.8% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i3-8100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $748 | $117-84% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $129 | $45-65% |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.9 | 135.0+188% |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2650L and Core i3-8100
