Xeon E5-2650L
VS
Core i7-5700HQ

Xeon E5-2650L vs Core i7-5700HQ

Intel

Xeon E5-2650L

8 Cores16 Thrd70 WWMax: 2.3 GHz2012
VS
Intel

Core i7-5700HQ

4 Cores8 Thrd47 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2650L is positioned at rank 916 and the Core i7-5700HQ is on rank 883, so the Core i7-5700HQ offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650L

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
25689%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
4850%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
4309%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
3329%
#515
Xeon E5-4640 v4
MSRP: $2837|Avg: N/A
98%
#516
Xeon E7-8867 v3
MSRP: $4672|Avg: $4672
98%
#517
Xeon Gold 6150
MSRP: $3358|Avg: $196
97%
#518
Xeon E5-1680 v3
MSRP: $1723|Avg: $200
95%
#519
Xeon E5-2690 v3
MSRP: $2090|Avg: $85
95%
#520
Xeon 6780E
MSRP: $11350|Avg: $8513
94%
#521
Xeon E5-2697A v4
MSRP: $2891|Avg: $121
92%
#522
Xeon Gold 6134
MSRP: $2214|Avg: $378
92%
#916
Xeon E5-2650L
MSRP: $748|Avg: $129
100%
#918
Xeon E5410
MSRP: $256|Avg: $20
98%
#924
Xeon E5-1660
MSRP: $1080|Avg: $29
95%
#931
Xeon E5-2660 v2
MSRP: $1393|Avg: $129
92%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-5700HQ

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
19519%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
18443%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13391%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4034%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3196%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2795%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1601%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1580%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1439%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1439%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1423%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1384%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1365%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1359%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1347%
#883
Core i7-5700HQ
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#884
Athlon II X2 265
MSRP: $83|Avg: $15
100%
#885
Core i3-2100
MSRP: $117|Avg: $10
99%
#886
A8-3800
MSRP: $130|Avg: $40
99%
#887
Pentium E5200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
98%
#888
Athlon II X2 235e
MSRP: $69|Avg: $15
98%
#889
Athlon II X2 250e
MSRP: $77|Avg: $15
98%
#890
Core i7-2600S
MSRP: $297|Avg: $99
98%
#891
Athlon II X2 250u
MSRP: $60|Avg: $15
98%
#892
Pentium G6951
MSRP: $89|Avg: $50
97%
#893
Core i3-2125
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
97%
#895
Celeron G1820
MSRP: $110|Avg: $15
97%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
96%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
96%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Use Case Distinction: This is a comparison between a Professional Workstation processor ($129) and a Consumer Desktop CPU. The Xeon E5-2650L is engineered for massive parallel workloads (rendering, scientific simulations), offering significantly higher core counts.
InsightXeon E5-2650LCore i7-5700HQ
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($129)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-H (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Core i7-5700HQ ($0), however, is optimized for mixed workloads and gaming. For most users, it offers superior single-thread performance and responsiveness at a fraction of the cost ($129 less, 100% cheaper), making it the better choice for daily use and gaming.
InsightXeon E5-2650LCore i7-5700HQ
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($129)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650L and Core i7-5700HQ

Intel

Xeon E5-2650L

The Xeon E5-2650L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,055 points. Launch price was $142.

Intel

Core i7-5700HQ

The Core i7-5700HQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-H (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1364. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,037 points. Launch price was $378.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2650L packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-5700HQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L versus 3.5 GHz on the Core i7-5700HQ — a 41.4% clock advantage for the Core i7-5700HQ (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650L uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-5700HQ uses Broadwell-H (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650L scores 6,055 against the Core i7-5700HQ's 6,037 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2650L. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L vs 6 MB (total) on the Core i7-5700HQ.

FeatureXeon E5-2650LCore i7-5700HQ
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+100%
4 / 8
Boost Clock
2.3 GHz
3.5 GHz+52%
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.7 GHz+50%
L3 Cache
20480 kB (total)+233%
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
32 nm
14 nm-56%
Architecture
Sandy Bridge-EP (2012)
Broadwell-H (2015)
PassMark
6,055
6,037
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2650L uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-5700HQ uses BGA1364 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureXeon E5-2650LCore i7-5700HQ
Socket
LGA2011
BGA1364
PCIe Generation
PCIe 5.0+67%
PCIe 3.0