Xeon E5-2650L vs Core i7-4810MQ
Xeon E5-2650L
Core i7-4810MQ
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2650L is positioned at rank 916 and the Core i7-4810MQ is on rank 956, so the Xeon E5-2650L offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2650L
Performance Per Dollar Core i7-4810MQ
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i7-4810MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($129) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell (2013−2015) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i7-4810MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+192%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($129) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($378) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2650L and Core i7-4810MQ
Xeon E5-2650L
The Xeon E5-2650L is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 6 March 2012 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.3 GHz. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 70 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,055 points. Launch price was $142.
Core i7-4810MQ
The Core i7-4810MQ is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 January 2014 (11 years ago). It is based on the Haswell (2013−2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: PGA946. Thermal design power (TDP): 47 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 6,074 points. Launch price was $378.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2650L packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i7-4810MQ offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Xeon E5-2650L has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2650L versus 3.8 GHz on the Core i7-4810MQ — a 49.2% clock advantage for the Core i7-4810MQ (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2650L uses the Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) architecture (32 nm), while the Core i7-4810MQ uses Haswell (2013−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2650L scores 6,055 against the Core i7-4810MQ's 6,074 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i7-4810MQ. L3 cache: 20480 kB (total) on the Xeon E5-2650L vs 8 MB (total) on the Core i7-4810MQ.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i7-4810MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 2.3 GHz | 3.8 GHz+65% |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz+56% |
| L3 Cache | 20480 kB (total)+150% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 256 kB (per core) | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 32 nm | 22 nm-31% |
| Architecture | Sandy Bridge-EP (2012) | Haswell (2013−2015) |
| PassMark | 6,055 | 6,074 |
Memory & Platform
The Xeon E5-2650L uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Core i7-4810MQ uses PGA946 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i7-4810MQ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | PGA946 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2650L launched at $748 MSRP, while the Core i7-4810MQ debuted at $378. At current prices ($129 vs $378), the Xeon E5-2650L is $249 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2650L delivers 46.9 pts/$ vs 16.1 pts/$ for the Core i7-4810MQ — making the Xeon E5-2650L the 98% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2650L | Core i7-4810MQ |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $748 | $378-49% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $129-66% | $378 |
| Performance per Dollar | 46.9+191% | 16.1 |
| Release Date | 2012 | 2014 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2650L and Core i7-4810MQ
