Xeon E5-2667 v2
VS
Core i5-10400

Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Core i5-10400

Intel

Xeon E5-2667 v2

8 Cores16 Thrd130 WWMax: 4 GHz2013
VS
Intel

Core i5-10400

6 Cores12 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.3 GHz2020

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is positioned at rank #362 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667 v2

#1
Xeon Platinum 8454H
MSRP: $6540|Avg: N/A
5116%
#6
Xeon Gold 6240R
MSRP: $2444|Avg: N/A
966%
#10
Xeon 6337P
MSRP: $60|Avg: $5
858%
#15
EPYC 9174F
MSRP: $194|Avg: $30
663%
#257
Xeon W-1290
MSRP: $498|Avg: $300
99%
#258
EPYC 9124
MSRP: $1083|Avg: $1083
99%
#260
EPYC 4584PX
MSRP: $1517|Avg: $1517
98%
#362
Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
100%
#367
Xeon E5-1410
MSRP: $120|Avg: $55
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i5-10400

#270
Core i9-10850K
MSRP: $453|Avg: $300
107%
#271
Core i9-13900E
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
107%
#272
Core i9-9820X
MSRP: $889|Avg: $280
107%
#273
Core i9-9900X
MSRP: $989|Avg: $300
105%
#274
Ryzen 7 1800X
MSRP: $499|Avg: $120
48%
#274
Core i7-9700K
MSRP: $385|Avg: $200
105%
#275
Core i3-10320
MSRP: $154|Avg: $140
104%
#276
Core i5-9600KF
MSRP: $262|Avg: $150
104%
#277
Ryzen 3 PRO 5355GE
MSRP: $180|Avg: $180
103%
#278
Core i7-14701TE
MSRP: $392|Avg: $390
103%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
45%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
42%
#279
Core i9-11900KF
MSRP: $513|Avg: $349
103%
#280
Athlon Silver 3050GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $65
102%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
42%
#281
Core i7-9700E
MSRP: $259|Avg: $180
102%
#282
Core i7-11700K
MSRP: $399|Avg: $350
102%
#283
Ryzen 7 PRO 3700
MSRP: $329|Avg: $330
101%
#283
Ryzen Threadripper 1920
MSRP: $799|Avg: $200
40%
#284
Core i7-14701E
MSRP: $392|Avg: $380
100%
#284
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
40%
#285
Core i5-10400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $175
100%
#286
Core i3-12100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $180
100%
#287
Core Ultra 9 285T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $549
98%
#288
Ryzen Threadripper 1950
MSRP: $999|Avg: $300
32%
#288
Core i5-12500TE
MSRP: $225|Avg: $225
97%
#289
Athlon Silver PRO 3125GE
MSRP: $108|Avg: $70
97%
#290
Core i9-10900KF
MSRP: $509|Avg: $336
97%
#291
Core i9-14900T
MSRP: $549|Avg: $577
97%
#291
Core i9-7900X
MSRP: $999|Avg: $188
31%
#292
Core i5-13500T
MSRP: $342|Avg: $342
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Core i5-10400 (2020) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR4-2666, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightXeon E5-2667 v2Core i5-10400
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($175)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake (2020−2025) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 (2013) relies on 22 nm technology and DDR3, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightXeon E5-2667 v2Core i5-10400
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+69%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($300)
More affordable ($175)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Core i5-10400

Intel

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

Intel

Core i5-10400

The Core i5-10400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 30 April 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake (2020−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 11,988 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Core i5-10400 offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 versus 4.3 GHz on the Core i5-10400 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i5-10400 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture (22 nm), while the Core i5-10400 uses Comet Lake (2020−2025) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2667 v2 scores 12,186 against the Core i5-10400's 11,988 — a 1.6% lead for the Xeon E5-2667 v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs 12 MB (total) on the Core i5-10400.

FeatureXeon E5-2667 v2Core i5-10400
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+33%
6 / 12
Boost Clock
4 GHz
4.3 GHz+7%
Base Clock
3.3 GHz+14%
2.9 GHz
L3 Cache
20 MB (total)+67%
12 MB (total)
L2 Cache
256 kB (per core)
256K (per core)
Process
22 nm
14 nm-36%
Architecture
Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
Comet Lake (2020−2025)
PassMark
12,186+2%
11,988
Cinebench R23 Multi
8,313
Geekbench 6 Single
1,600
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses the LGA2011 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i5-10400 uses LGA1200 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 versus DDR4-2666 on the Core i5-10400 — the Core i5-10400 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 142.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Xeon E5-2667 v2) vs 2 (Core i5-10400). PCIe lanes: 40 (Xeon E5-2667 v2) vs 16 (Core i5-10400) — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2667 v2) and 400-series (Core i5-10400).

FeatureXeon E5-2667 v2Core i5-10400
Socket
LGA2011
LGA1200
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1866
DDR4-2666+33%
Max RAM Capacity
768 GB+500%
128 GB
RAM Channels
4+100%
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
40+150%
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Xeon E5-2667 v2) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i5-10400). The Core i5-10400 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 630), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i5-10400 targets Gaming. Direct competitor: Core i5-10400 rivals Ryzen 5 3600.

FeatureXeon E5-2667 v2Core i5-10400
Integrated GPU
No
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 630
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Gaming
💰

Value Analysis

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 launched at $300 MSRP, while the Core i5-10400 debuted at $182. At current prices ($300 vs $175), the Core i5-10400 is $125 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2667 v2 delivers 40.6 pts/$ vs 68.5 pts/$ for the Core i5-10400 — making the Core i5-10400 the 51.1% better value option.

FeatureXeon E5-2667 v2Core i5-10400
MSRP
$300
$182-39%
Avg Price (30d)
$300
$175-42%
Performance per Dollar
40.6
68.5+69%
Release Date
2013
2020