Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,812 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
✅Delivers 597.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 40.6 vs 5.8 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
✅Draws 130W instead of 150W, a 20W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,186 vs 12,301).

Xeon E5-2687W v2

2013

Why buy it

✅+0.9% higher PassMark.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($2,112 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
❌15.4% higher power demand at 150W vs 130W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2687W v2 better than Xeon E5-2667 v2?

Yes. Xeon E5-2687W v2 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

For gaming, this matchup is basically a tie in the data we have.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2687W v2 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2687W v2 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2667 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2687W v2 comes in 604.0% more expensive on MSRP at $2,112 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.4% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2667 v2 is also 597.4% better value on MSRP (40.6 vs 5.8 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2687W v2 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2667 v2 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

Xeon E5-2687W v2

The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2667 v2 and Xeon E5-2687W v2 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). Both are built on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture using a 22 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2667 v2 scores 12,186 against the Xeon E5-2687W v2's 12,301 — a 0.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2687W v2. Both processors carry 20 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon E5-2667 v2	Xeon E5-2687W v2
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.4 GHz+3%
L3 Cache	20 MB (total)	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	256 kB (per core)	256 kB (per core)
Process	22 nm	22 nm
Architecture	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,186	12,301

🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0.

Feature	Xeon E5-2667 v2	Xeon E5-2687W v2
Socket	LGA2011	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR3-1866	—
Max RAM Capacity	768 GB	—
RAM Channels	4	—
ECC Support	Yes	—
PCIe Lanes	40	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2667 v2 was priced at $300, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 came in at $2112. On launch pricing ($300 vs $2112), Xeon E5-2667 v2 was $1812 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2667 v2 delivers 40.6 pts/$ vs 5.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — making the Xeon E5-2667 v2 the 149.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2667 v2	Xeon E5-2687W v2
MSRP	$300-86%	$2112
Performance per Dollar	40.6+600%	5.8
Release Date	2013	2013

Search Xeon E5-2667 v2 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2687W v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.