PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2667 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i3-12100

2022

Why buy it

✅+1.1% higher PassMark.
✅Costs $178 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Delivers 148.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
✅Draws 60W instead of 130W, a 70W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,186 vs 12,315).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 40.6 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($300 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
❌116.7% higher power demand at 130W vs 60W.
❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i3-12100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-12100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i3-12100 better than Xeon E5-2667 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2667 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i3-12100 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i3-12100 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.1% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i3-12100 is the better buy right now. Core i3-12100 comes in $178 cheaper on MSRP at $122 MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.1% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2667 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 3.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 148.5% better value on MSRP (100.9 vs 40.6 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i3-12100 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2013), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA2011, and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-12100

The Core i3-12100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,315 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i3-12100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-12100 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-12100 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Core i3-12100 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-12100 scores 12,315 against the Xeon E5-2667 v2's 12,186 — a 1.1% lead for the Core i3-12100. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-12100 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v2.

Feature	Core i3-12100	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	8 / 16+100%
Boost Clock	4.3 GHz+7%	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.3 GHz	3.3 GHz
L3 Cache	12 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+67%
L2 Cache	1.25 MB (per core)+400%	256 kB (per core)
Process	Intel 7 nm-68%	22 nm
Architecture	Alder Lake-S (2022)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,315+1%	12,186
Geekbench 6 Single	2,157	—

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i3-12100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Core i3-12100 versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — the Core i3-12100 supports 157.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2667 v2 supports up to 768 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i3-12100) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2667 v2). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i3-12100) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2667 v2) — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: H610,B660,H670,Z690,B760,Z790 (Core i3-12100) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2667 v2).

Feature	Core i3-12100	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Socket	LGA1700	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-4800+157%	DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	768 GB+500%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	No	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	40+100%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-12100) / not specified (Xeon E5-2667 v2). The Core i3-12100 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-12100 targets Budget Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-12100 rivals Ryzen 5 5500.

Feature	Core i3-12100	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	UHD Graphics 730	—
Unlocked	No	—
AVX-512	No	—
Virtualization	VT-x, VT-d, EPT	—
Target Use	Budget Gaming Desktop	—

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i3-12100 was priced at $122, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 came in at $300. On launch pricing ($122 vs $300), Core i3-12100 was $178 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-12100 delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 40.6 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — making the Core i3-12100 the 85.2% better value option.

Feature	Core i3-12100	Xeon E5-2667 v2
MSRP	$122-59%	$300
Performance per Dollar	100.9+149%	40.6
Release Date	2022	2013

Search Core i3-12100 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2667 v2 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.