
Core i3-12100

Xeon E5-2687W v2
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i3-12100
2022Why buy it
- ✅+0.1% higher PassMark.
- ✅Costs $1,990 less on MSRP ($122 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1633.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 100.9 vs 5.8 PassMark/$ ($122 MSRP vs $2,112 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 60W instead of 150W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and older memory support.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2687W v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2687W v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.
Xeon E5-2687W v2
2013Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+66.7% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (12,301 vs 12,315).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 5.8 vs 100.9 PassMark/$ ($2,112 MSRP vs $122 MSRP).
- ❌150% higher power demand at 150W vs 60W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011, while Core i3-12100 moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i3-12100 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i3-12100 better than Xeon E5-2687W v2?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i3-12100 vs Xeon E5-2687W v2 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i3-12100
The Core i3-12100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 4 January 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 60 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 12,315 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2687W v2
The Xeon E5-2687W v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,301 points. Launch price was $1,605.
Processing Power
The Core i3-12100 packs 4 cores / 8 threads, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2687W v2 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.3 GHz on the Core i3-12100 versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — a 7.2% clock advantage for the Core i3-12100 (base: 3.3 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i3-12100 uses the Alder Lake-S (2022) architecture (Intel 7 nm), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Core i3-12100 scores 12,315 against the Xeon E5-2687W v2's 12,301 — a 0.1% lead for the Core i3-12100. L3 cache: 12 MB (total) on the Core i3-12100 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2687W v2.
| Feature | Core i3-12100 | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 8 / 16+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.3 GHz+7% | 4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.3 GHz | 3.4 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 12 MB (total) | 20 MB (total)+67% |
| L2 Cache | 1.25 MB (per core)+400% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-68% | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Alder Lake-S (2022) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,315 | 12,301 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,157 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Core i3-12100 uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Core i3-12100 | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+67% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | No | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | — |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-12100) / not specified (Xeon E5-2687W v2). The Core i3-12100 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 730), while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-12100 targets Budget Gaming Desktop. Direct competitor: Core i3-12100 rivals Ryzen 5 5500.
| Feature | Core i3-12100 | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | — |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics 730 | — |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d, EPT | — |
| Target Use | Budget Gaming Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i3-12100 was priced at $122, while the Xeon E5-2687W v2 came in at $2112. On launch pricing ($122 vs $2112), Core i3-12100 was $1990 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i3-12100 delivers 100.9 pts/$ vs 5.8 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2687W v2 — making the Core i3-12100 the 178.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i3-12100 | Xeon E5-2687W v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $122-94% | $2112 |
| Performance per Dollar | 100.9+1640% | 5.8 |
| Release Date | 2022 | 2013 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














