Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2667 v2

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 2600E

6 / 12

12,346

+1.3%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2667 v2

8 / 16

12,186

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2667 v2: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 2600E

2018

Why buy it

✅+1.3% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 45W instead of 130W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 v2 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 20 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2667 v2, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

2013

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +11.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+25% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 0.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,186 vs 12,346).
❌Launch MSRP is still $300 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌188.9% higher power demand at 130W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 2600E better than Xeon E5-2667 v2?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2667 v2 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2600E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600E is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.3% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 2600E is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2667 v2 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 2600E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $300 MSRP, and it still gives you 1.3% better PassMark. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2667 v2 is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 11.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2667 v2 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (40.6 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 2600E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2013) and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2667 v2 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 2600E

The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2667 v2

The Xeon E5-2667 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 130 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,186 points. Launch price was $2,300.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2667 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v2 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.1 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Xeon E5-2667 v2's 12,186 — a 1.3% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600E. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v2.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon E5-2667 v2
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	3.3 GHz+6%
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	20 MB (total)+25%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256 kB (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Ivy Bridge-EP (2013)
PassMark	12,346+1%	12,186

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2667 v2 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.