Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 2600E

6 / 12

12,346

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-2618L v4

10 / 20

12,429

+0.7%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 2600E

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 45W instead of 75W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,346 vs 12,429).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2618L v4, which brings 10 cores / 20 threads.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
✅+56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 10 cores / 20 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Launch MSRP is still $779 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌66.7% higher power demand at 75W vs 45W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 2600E better than Xeon E5-2618L v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2600E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2618L v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.7% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 56.3% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 2600E is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2618L v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 5 2600E comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $779 MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Xeon E5-2618L v4 is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.7% better PassMark. Xeon E5-2618L v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 2600E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2016). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon E5-2618L v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 2600E

The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 2600E packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 — a 58.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 2600E. The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Xeon E5-2618L v4's 12,429 — a 0.7% lead for the Xeon E5-2618L v4. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon E5-2618L v4
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	10 / 20+67%
Boost Clock	4 GHz+82%	2.2 GHz
Base Clock	3.1 GHz	—
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	25 MB+56%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+20380%	2.5 MB
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,346	12,429