Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon W-10855M

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon W-10855M Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 2600E

6 / 12

12,346

+0.8%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon W-10855M

6 / 12

12,249

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon W-10855M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon W-10855M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 2600E

2018

Why buy it

✅+0.8% higher PassMark.
✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-10855M across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌2900% higher power demand at 45W vs 1.5W.

Xeon W-10855M

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +12.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Draws 2W instead of 45W, a 44W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (12,249 vs 12,346).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $118 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 2600E mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon W-10855M better than Ryzen 5 2600E?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon W-10855M makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 2600E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 2600E is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.8% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads. It also has the larger cache pool with 33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon W-10855M is the better buy right now. Xeon W-10855M comes in at an unclear MSRP at $118 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 12.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The compromise is that Ryzen 5 2600E is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 0.8% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (103.8 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon W-10855M makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2020 vs 2018). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Ryzen 5 2600E vs Xeon W-10855M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 2600E

The Ryzen 5 2600E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 12,346 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon W-10855M

The Xeon W-10855M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Comet Lake-H (2020) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB. L2 cache: 1.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1440. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 12,249 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 2600E and Xeon W-10855M share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 2600E versus 4.9 GHz on the Xeon W-10855M — a 20.2% clock advantage for the Xeon W-10855M (base: 3.1 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon W-10855M uses Comet Lake-H (2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 2600E scores 12,346 against the Xeon W-10855M's 12,249 — a 0.8% lead for the Ryzen 5 2600E. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 2600E vs 12 MB on the Xeon W-10855M.

Feature	Ryzen 5 2600E	Xeon W-10855M
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	6 / 12
Boost Clock	4 GHz	4.9 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3.1 GHz+11%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)+33%	12 MB
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+34033%	1.5 MB
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Comet Lake-H (2020)
PassMark	12,346	12,249

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 2600E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-10855M uses BGA1440 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.