CPU
GPU
Xeon E5-2667 v3
Xeon E5-2680 v2
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Xeon E5-2667 v3 is positioned at rank 964 and the Xeon E5-2680 v2 is on rank 636, so the Xeon E5-2680 v2 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2667 v3
Performance Per Dollar Xeon E5-2680 v2
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Xeon E5-2667 v3 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($150) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($462) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Haswell-EP (2014−2015) / 22 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) / 22 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Xeon E5-2667 v3 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+202%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($150) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($462) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Xeon E5-2667 v3 and Xeon E5-2680 v2
Xeon E5-2667 v3
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,474 points. Launch price was $800.
Xeon E5-2680 v2
The Xeon E5-2680 v2 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 September 2013 (12 years ago). It is based on the Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 115 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 12,707 points. Launch price was $1,260.
Processing Power
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 offers 10 cores / 20 threads — the Xeon E5-2680 v2 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v3 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2680 v2 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Xeon E5-2667 v3 uses the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture (22 nm), while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 uses Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2667 v3 scores 12,474 against the Xeon E5-2680 v2's 12,707 — a 1.9% lead for the Xeon E5-2680 v2. L3 cache: 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v3 vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2680 v2.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 v3 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 10 / 20+25% |
| Boost Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.2 GHz+14% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 20 MB (total) | 25 MB (total)+25% |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 22 nm | 22 nm |
| Architecture | Haswell-EP (2014−2015) | Ivy Bridge-EP (2013) |
| PassMark | 12,474 | 12,707+2% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the LGA2011 socket with PCIe 3.0. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2667 v3 versus DDR3-1866 on the Xeon E5-2680 v2 — the Xeon E5-2667 v3 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 768 GB of RAM. Both feature 4-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 40 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2667 v3) and Intel X79,Intel C602 (Xeon E5-2680 v2).
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 v3 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2011 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2133+33% | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 768 GB | 768 GB |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 4 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 40 | 40 |
Value Analysis
The Xeon E5-2667 v3 launched at $2057 MSRP, while the Xeon E5-2680 v2 debuted at $667. At current prices ($150 vs $462), the Xeon E5-2667 v3 is $312 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2667 v3 delivers 83.2 pts/$ vs 27.5 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2680 v2 — making the Xeon E5-2667 v3 the 100.6% better value option.
| Feature | Xeon E5-2667 v3 | Xeon E5-2680 v2 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2057 | $667-68% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $150-68% | $462 |
| Performance per Dollar | 83.2+203% | 27.5 |
| Release Date | 2014 | 2013 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Xeon E5-2667 v3 and Xeon E5-2680 v2
