Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB).
✅Costs $1,278 less on MSRP ($779 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 16.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$ ($779 MSRP vs $2,057 MSRP).
✅Draws 75W instead of 135W, a 60W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2667 v3 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,429 vs 12,474).

Xeon E5-2667 v3

2014

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +7.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (20 MB vs 25 MB).
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 6.1 vs 16.0 PassMark/$ ($2,057 MSRP vs $779 MSRP).
❌80% higher power demand at 135W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2667 v3 better than Xeon E5-2618L v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-2667 v3 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data and 0.4% better PassMark, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2667 v3 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.9% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2667 v3 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.4% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2667 v3 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2618L v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2667 v3 comes in 164.1% more expensive on MSRP at $2,057 MSRP versus $779 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2618L v4 is also 163.1% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 6.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2618L v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2016 vs 2014) and 25% larger total L3 cache (25 MB vs 20 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2667 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

Xeon E5-2667 v3

The Xeon E5-2667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,474 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 packs 10 cores / 20 threads, while the Xeon E5-2667 v3 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2618L v4 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 versus 3.6 GHz on the Xeon E5-2667 v3 — a 48.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2667 v3. The Xeon E5-2618L v4 uses the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture (14 nm), while the Xeon E5-2667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 scores 12,429 against the Xeon E5-2667 v3's 12,474 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E5-2667 v3. L3 cache: 25 MB on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs 20 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-2667 v3.

Feature	Xeon E5-2618L v4	Xeon E5-2667 v3
Cores / Threads	10 / 20+25%	8 / 16
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.6 GHz+64%
Base Clock	—	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB+25%	20 MB (total)
L2 Cache	2.5 MB	256K (per core)+10140%
Process	14 nm-36%	22 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	12,429	12,474

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 was priced at $779, while the Xeon E5-2667 v3 came in at $2057. On launch pricing ($779 vs $2057), Xeon E5-2618L v4 was $1278 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Xeon E5-2618L v4 delivers 16.0 pts/$ vs 6.1 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-2667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-2618L v4 the 89.8% better value option.

Feature	Xeon E5-2618L v4	Xeon E5-2667 v3
MSRP	$779-62%	$2057
Performance per Dollar	16.0+162%	6.1
Release Date	2016	2014

Search Xeon E5-2618L v4 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-2667 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.