Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Draws 75W instead of 90W, a 15W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2640 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (12,429 vs 12,470).
❌Launch MSRP is still $779 MSRP, while Xeon E5-2640 v4 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.

Trade-offs

❌20% higher power demand at 90W vs 75W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon E5-2640 v4 better than Xeon E5-2618L v4?

Yes. Xeon E5-2640 v4 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.3% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon E5-2640 v4 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 6.0% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon E5-2640 v4 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.3% better PassMark, backed by 10 cores and 20 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon E5-2640 v4 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-2618L v4 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Xeon E5-2640 v4 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $779 MSRP, and it still gives you a 6.0% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-2618L v4 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (16.0 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon E5-2640 v4 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 10 cores / 20 threads instead of 10/20. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Xeon E5-2618L v4 vs Xeon E5-2640 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Xeon E5-2618L v4

The Xeon E5-2618L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Thermal design power (TDP): 75 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 12,429 points. Launch price was $779.

Xeon E5-2640 v4

The Xeon E5-2640 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 10 cores and 20 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB. L2 cache: 2.5 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 90 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 12,470 points. Launch price was $939.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Xeon E5-2618L v4 and Xeon E5-2640 v4 share an identical 10-core/20-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2618L v4 versus 3.4 GHz on the Xeon E5-2640 v4 — a 42.9% clock advantage for the Xeon E5-2640 v4. Both are built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture using a 14 nm process. In PassMark, the Xeon E5-2618L v4 scores 12,429 against the Xeon E5-2640 v4's 12,470 — a 0.3% lead for the Xeon E5-2640 v4. Both processors carry 25 MB of L3 cache.

Feature	Xeon E5-2618L v4	Xeon E5-2640 v4
Cores / Threads	10 / 20	10 / 20
Boost Clock	2.2 GHz	3.4 GHz+55%
Base Clock	—	2.4 GHz
L3 Cache	25 MB	25 MB
L2 Cache	2.5 MB	2.5 MB
Process	14 nm	14 nm
Architecture	Broadwell (2015−2019)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	12,429	12,470